Many assert that not voting is a fundamental right, a free expression of political discontent. Some go as far as to say that compulsory voting is worse than being denied a vote and a violation of rights. Legal cases have been brought in defense of the right not to vote but to date no court has enforced it. Should it be true that the right to vote could be waived and hence in itself be a right not to vote and deserve constitutional protection? If so could other basic rights be waived? The minimum wage? Equal employment? Hill argues that legal recognition of the right not to vote is a dangerous path to tread.
The right to vote is an individual liberty but crucially a collective right at the core of democracy. Without political participation from society, government, public interests, security and the very fabric of society would be at stake. Vulnerable social groups would lose their voices; failure to vote could bring political oppression and far greater infringements to personal freedom. Hill therefore reasons that voting is a right and a duty; key to the structure and values of society, a moral responsibility and more important than an individual’s right not to vote.
So voluntary voting systems can continue to allow abstention, compulsory systems can have exemptions but as Hill states this “will not — and should not — constitute the exercise of any particular right, ” and “doing so would endanger — and possibly destroy — the system for which it exists: representative democracy. ”
Many
assert that not
voting
is a fundamental
right
, a free expression of political discontent.
Some
go as far as to say that compulsory
voting
is worse than
being denied
a
vote
and a violation of
rights
. Legal cases have
been brought
in defense of the
right
not to
vote
but
to date no court has enforced it. Should it be true that the
right
to
vote
could
be waived
and
hence
in itself be a
right
not to
vote
and deserve constitutional protection? If
so
could other basic
rights
be waived
? The minimum wage? Equal employment? Hill argues that legal recognition of the
right
not to
vote
is a
dangerous
path to tread.
The
right
to
vote
is an individual liberty
but
crucially
a collective
right
at the core of democracy. Without political participation from society,
government
, public interests, security and the
very
fabric of society would be at stake. Vulnerable social groups would lose their voices; failure to
vote
could bring political oppression and far greater infringements to personal freedom. Hill
therefore
reasons that
voting
is a
right
and a duty; key to the structure and values of society, a moral responsibility and more
important
than an individual’s
right
not to vote.
So
voluntary
voting
systems can continue to
allow
abstention, compulsory systems can have exemptions
but
as Hill states this “will not — and should not — constitute the exercise of any particular
right
,
”
and “doing
so
would endanger — and
possibly
destroy
— the system for which it exists: representative democracy. ”