Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Should public transportation be free for city residents?

Should public transportation be free for city residents? wMKAe

Firstly, making public transport free, the Government would be encouraging people to use public transport instead of driving to and from work. This would reduce the number of cars on the road. Global warming is a serious issue and if public transport was free, more people would use it, taking cars off the road. For example, one train could take 2000 cars off the road. A public transport system with 20 trains could take 40, 000 cars off the road. Secondly, countless people of a country will get benefited from this and they can travel freely and use their earning to fulfil other basic needs. It helps people to get out of poverty. For instance, a bus ticket in uk is about £2, if a person takes the bus twice a day it means that the person would louse £1. 460 a year just on transportation. This money could be used to buy clothes, food or something that is really necessary. However, public transportation services would be a monetary burden for the government. It would be difficult for the government to sustain it. This, in turn, would affect the quality and reliability of provided services. Additionally, in order to subsidise services, the government would have to use public money. This would be done at the expense of other sectors. Take, for example, education and healthcare. In order to make public transport free, authorities have to spend less on services like education and healthcare. In conclusion, free public transportation would accelerate clean air and less traffic congestion in metropolitans. Nonetheless, the detrimental side-effects on the economy cannot be ignored. Therefore, I tend to believe that free-of-charge public transportation should be provided in most big cities.

Firstly
, making You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportationshipmentshipping
transport
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
Government
 would be encouraging You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportationshipmentshipping
transport
instead
 of driving to and from work. This would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 the number of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 on the road. Global warming is a serious issue and if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportationshipmentshipping
transport
 was You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
, more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 it, taking You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 off the road. For example
, one train could take 2000 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 off the road. A You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportationshipmentshipping
transport
 system with 20 trains could take 40, 000 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 off the road.

Secondly
, countless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 of a country will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 benefited from Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).this, and
this and
 they can travel freely
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 their earning to fulfil other basic needs. It This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 out of poverty. For instance
, a bus ticket in Possible spelling mistake found.UKupusOKSKUV
uk
 is about £2, if a person takes the bus twice a day it means that the person would louse £1. 460 a year This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportshipmentshipping
transportation
. This money could be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 clothes, food or something that is
really
 necessary.

However
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportshipmentshipping
transportation
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
 would be a monetary burden for the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
. It would be difficult for the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 to sustain it. This, in turn, would affect the quality and reliability of provided You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
. Additionally
, in order to Possible spelling mistake. 'subsidise' is British English.subsidize
subsidise
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 would This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 money. This would be done
 at the expense of other sectors. Take, for example
, education and healthcare. In order to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportationshipmentshipping
transport
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
, authorities This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 spend less on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdutyuseofficebusinesssupplyassistance
services
 like education and healthcare.

In conclusion
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplimentary
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportshipmentshipping
transportation
 would accelerate clean air and less traffic congestion in metropolitans. Nonetheless, the detrimental Did you mean "side effects" (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.side effects
side-effects
 on the economy cannot be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :neglected
ignored
. Therefore
, I tend to believe that free-of-charge You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransittransportshipmentshipping
transportation
 should be provided
 in most This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hugeenormousgiganticvast
big
 cities. 