Year by year technques is being improved. Of course it includes transportations. Definetely it worthes a lot of money. Population is competating with each other about should goverment spend more money on improvind roads and highways or public transports. Personally i think that the government should hand out money on proving public transports. And at the below i will give examples why i chose this way.
To begin with, first reason of improving public transports is the possibility to reduce amount of traffic jams which lead a major of influence on air pollution. it is vindicated that elector cars don't produce harmful chemicals. If scientist develop such as cars more, we can at least decrease one of global problems. Second reason i agree with it is that developed piblic transportation will decrease number of traffic jams. Traffic jams npt only cost the people's time and expense bur also create on person bad mood. It greately decreases the productivity's works. Finally i want to say that it can help to most of poor humans who can't afford to buy personal car. Surely government should reckon anout them and students. As we know the best transport for student it is public transport which most of parents also believe so. Because it is more secure and cheap. However we can't refuse the fact is that in many places roads aren't in good condition. So that human don't have to wait for developing cars which they can go on every type of road. It can take more time than we expect. Due to that govenment should help on developing roads at least temporary.
In conclusion, the first way is more productive and useful. but the second way is also needful. i thibk that government should share money on both ways. for country it would be useless to have good traspotrs without good roads and high roads
Year by year
technques
is being
improved
. Of
course it
includes transportations.
Definetely
it
worthes
a lot of
money
. Population is
competating
with each other about should
goverment
spend more
money
on
improvind
roads
and highways or
public
transports
.
Personally
i
think
that the
government
should hand out
money
on proving
public
transports
. And at the below
i
will give examples why
i
chose this way.
To
begin
with,
first
reason of improving
public
transports
is the possibility to
reduce
amount of traffic jams which lead a major of influence on air pollution.
it
is vindicated
that elector
cars
don't produce harmful chemicals. If scientist develop such as
cars
more, we can at least decrease one of global problems. Second reason
i
agree
with it is that developed
piblic
transportation will decrease number of traffic jams. Traffic jams
npt
only
cost the
people
's time and expense bur
also
create on person
bad
mood. It
greately
decreases the productivity's works.
Finally
i
want to say that it can
help
to most of poor humans who can't afford to
buy
personal
car
.
Surely
government
should reckon
anout
them and students. As we know the best
transport
for student it is
public
transport
which
most of parents
also
believe
so
.
Because
it is more secure and
cheap
.
However
we can't refuse the fact is that in
many
places
roads
aren't in
good
condition.
So
that human don
't
have to
wait for developing
cars
which they can go on every type of
road
. It can take more time than we
expect
. Due to that
govenment
should
help
on developing
roads
at least temporary.
In conclusion
, the
first
way is more productive and useful.
but
the second way is
also
needful.
i
thibk
that
government
should share
money
on both ways.
for
country it
would be useless to have
good
traspotrs
without
good
roads
and high
roads