Sentencing young people, who did illegal things
Sentencing young people, who did illegal things 2K7oj
Sentencing young people, who did illegal things, by arresting has been a contraversial idea over the years. Whereas there are a huge refussion to this idea globally and supportion to other ways, such as community service, to learn guilty youths rather than blame them, others resist that they are still criminals and should be kept away from the community.
There are many advantages for follwing altrenative ways to deal with such poor people. In all probability, many of them did bad things enthausiastically to elaminate their uncontrolled energy. However, it's totaly supported to give them other chance to rearrange their situation with aim of being good citizens again. Furthermore, old criminals, who are already in the prisons, for doing very bad things, killing and burgalars for example, make prisons' enviroment very croul. It's absolutely not fair to enforce these misrable guilty youths to stay in such community and ask them to change.
On the other hand, there is a serious hisitation about keeping them out of prison. It's quite possible that the other chance may well be used unressponsibly. They may become more and more confident to do crimes thanks to beaing unpunished. Moreover, it's believed that they are criminals, allowing them to stay in the community is a huge threatening to others. Finnaly, such altrenative solutions require a pletora of money and efforts, which will be a further huge loud for the governments.
On balance, I think that punish young people is affected by many social and individual factors. If they did a serious crime, they would be arrested, otherswise alternative might may be considered.
Sentencing young
people
, who did illegal things, by arresting has been a
contraversial
idea
over the years. Whereas there are a huge
refussion
to this
idea
globally and
supportion
to
other
ways, such as community service, to learn guilty youths
rather
than blame them, others resist that they are
still
criminals and should be
kept
away from the community.
There are
many
advantages for
follwing
altrenative
ways to deal with such poor
people
. In all probability,
many
of them did
bad
things
enthausiastically
to
elaminate
their uncontrolled energy.
However
,
it's
totaly
supported to give them
other
chance to rearrange their situation with aim of being
good
citizens again.
Furthermore
,
old
criminals, who are already in the prisons, for doing
very
bad
things, killing and
burgalars
for example
,
make
prisons'
enviroment
very
croul
.
It's
absolutely
not
fair
to enforce these
misrable
guilty youths to stay in such community and ask them to
change
.
On the
other
hand, there is a serious
hisitation
about keeping them out of prison.
It's
quite possible that the
other
chance may well be
used
unressponsibly
. They may become more and more confident to do crimes thanks to
beaing
unpunished.
Moreover
,
it's
believed that they are criminals, allowing them to stay in the community is a huge threatening to others.
Finnaly
, such
altrenative
solutions require a
pletora
of money and efforts, which will be a
further
huge loud for the
governments
.
On balance, I
think
that punish young
people
is
affected
by
many
social and individual factors. If they did a serious crime, they would
be arrested
,
otherswise
alternative might may
be considered
.