Environmental problems are clearly something that is often discussed in today’s world. One part of the society claims that individuals should change their habits and lifestyle to improve the ecological situation. Others, on the other hand, believe that this issue should be solved on the governmental level. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and my perspective will be offered.
It is hard to deny that human kind is responsible for the current environmental situation, and it seems impossible to achieve any noticeable result in this field without the participation of vast majority of individuals. For instance, a simple lifestyle change such as introducing the separation of household rubbish can make recycling projects more convenient and efficient. Moreover, consumers can reduce their usage of plastic items and, in turn, less plastic waste will contaminate the environment.
However, many people still feel that the government has more tools to prevent environmental changes. One option that the authorities have is to discourage citizens from using personal vehicles by charging high taxes and additional fees. Moreover, politicians usually have access to resources to educate people about environmental problems and promote the most important ecological projects on all levels, ranging from special courses at schools to TV shows and websites related to this topic. Furthermore, it is a key responsibility of the government to protect the environment by spending state funds on research and modern equipment. Countries where legislation protects the ecology, for example Norway, have achieved visible results and overcame most environmental problems.
In conclusion, I believe that a combined approach will work best to prevent or reverse environmental changes. A contribution of every individual is just as important as the intervention from the government in order to fix existing issues and save our planet for future generations.
Environmental
problems are
clearly
something
that is
often
discussed in
today
’s world. One part of the society claims that individuals should
change
their habits and lifestyle to
improve
the ecological situation. Others,
on the other hand
, believe that this issue should
be solved
on the governmental level. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and my perspective will
be offered
.
It is
hard
to deny that
human kind
is responsible for the
current
environmental
situation, and it seems impossible to achieve any noticeable result in this field without the participation of
vast majority of
individuals.
For instance
, a simple lifestyle
change
such as introducing the separation of household rubbish can
make
recycling projects more convenient and efficient.
Moreover
, consumers can
reduce
their usage of plastic items and, in turn, less plastic waste will contaminate the environment.
However
,
many
people
still
feel that the
government
has more tools to
prevent
environmental
changes
. One option that the authorities have is to discourage citizens from using personal vehicles by charging high taxes and additional fees.
Moreover
, politicians
usually
have access to resources to educate
people
about
environmental
problems and promote the most
important
ecological projects on all levels, ranging from special courses at schools to TV
shows
and websites related to this topic.
Furthermore
, it is a key responsibility of the
government
to protect the environment by spending state funds on research and modern equipment. Countries where legislation protects the ecology,
for example
Norway, have achieved visible results and overcame most
environmental
problems.
In conclusion
, I believe that a combined approach will work best to
prevent
or reverse
environmental
changes
. A contribution of every individual is
just
as
important
as the intervention from the
government
in order to
fix
existing issues and save our planet for future generations.