Recently scientists worried about climate change have urged governments to introduce
measures to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that are seen as its main cause.
Simoultaneouslty, politicians and environmentalists have urged individuals to make
changes to their lifestyle. I shall argue that governments and individuals should take
join responsibility for this problem.
Firstly, industry accounts for a large proportion of the greenhouse gas emissions, and
this can only be controlled by government action. Measures could be taken to
discourage pollution, such as limiting or taxing the use of fossil fuels. Alternatively,
subsidies could be offered
to industries to clean up their production processes. If these ideas were adopted, I
believe that businesses would regard pollution as a financial issue.
Secondly, only discussion between governments can ensure that solutions are
successful. The Kyoto agreement, for example, tried to reach global agreement on
how to address the problem. Without such co-operating, it seems to me that efforts to
reduce fuel consumption are unlikely to be effective.
However, national and international policies will only secceed if individuals also change
their lifestyle. For example, people could think more carefully about how they use energy
in their homes. By using less electricity, installing energy- efficient light bulbs and
electrical
appliances, or investing in solar panels, individuals can make a real difference.
In addition, I think individual attitudes to transport need to change. Instead of
making short tips by car, people could choose to walk, cycle, or take a bus. Since cars
are a major source of the problem, changing our behaviour in this area would have a
major impact.
In conclusion, I would maintain that only a combination of international agreement,
national policies, and changes in individual behaviour will succeed in preventing
further damage to the environment.
Recently scientists worried about climate
change
have urged
governments
to introduce
measures to
reduce
the greenhouse gas emissions that are
seen
as its main cause.
Simoultaneouslty
, politicians and environmentalists have urged
individuals
to
make
changes
to their lifestyle. I shall argue that
governments
and
individuals
should take
join
responsibility for this problem.
Firstly
, industry accounts for a large proportion of the greenhouse gas emissions, and
this can
only
be controlled
by
government
action. Measures could
be taken
to
discourage pollution, such as limiting or taxing the
use
of fossil fuels.
Alternatively
,
subsidies could
be offered
to industries to clean up their production processes. If these
ideas
were adopted
, I
believe that businesses would regard pollution as a financial issue.
Secondly
,
only
discussion between
governments
can ensure that solutions are
successful. The Kyoto agreement,
for example
, tried to reach global agreement on
how to address the problem. Without such co-operating, it seems to me that efforts to
reduce
fuel consumption are unlikely to be effective.
However
, national and international policies will
only
secceed
if
individuals
also
change
their lifestyle.
For example
,
people
could
think
more
carefully
about how they
use
energy
in their homes. By using less electricity, installing energy- efficient light bulbs and
electrical
appliances, or investing in solar panels,
individuals
can
make
a real difference.
In addition
, I
think
individual
attitudes to transport need to
change
.
Instead
of
making short tips by car,
people
could choose to walk, cycle, or take a bus. Since cars
are a major source of the problem, changing our
behaviour
in this area would have a
major impact.
In conclusion
, I would maintain that
only
a combination of international agreement,
national policies, and
changes
in
individual
behaviour
will succeed in preventing
further
damage to the environment.