Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Scientific research should be restricted to provide education and personal knowledge. Do you agree?

Scientific research should be restricted to provide education and personal knowledge. Do you agree? m15Yd
Knowledge never goes in vain. If you have learned something, you will reap its benefits sooner or later. The argument of restriciting scientific research only for personal knowledge enhancement or providing seems to be baseless. It is because of scientific reserches that many legfacy systems have been supplanted by contemporary tools making our lives easier ever before. First of all, people of the opinion that scientific research should fall within the ambit of the predefined fields should have a second thought and broden their views. Research of any kind in such a way would be purely self-centered. Studies done be reputed universities and scientists are more in the interest of public or society rather than aimed at some person. For instance, all the scientific researches done by NASA the American space research organisation, have greatly contributed to humanity, as the outcomes of its research have had a massive positive impact on all human lives around the world. Had it not been for such scientific research, many poor countries would still be in doldrums. Moreover, not only do scientific research help improve human health, but it also addresses the well-being of animals and the mother nature. A myriad of fields such as agriculture, astronomy, social science, archaeology, literature, education and many more are open for scientific experiments and have great scope of improvements. To sum-up, the intense research done by scholars and scientists in the right direction can help us all in numerous ways. I, thus, strongly back that scientific researches should be conducted without any boundary, and not for just personal enhancement. If science will not save the world, what will? Rampant progress in science and technology will be the only panacea to all the problems which plague mother earth.
Knowledge never goes in vain. If you have learned something, you will reap its benefits sooner or later. The argument of
Possible spelling mistake found.
restriciting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
for personal knowledge enhancement or providing seems to be baseless. It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
Possible spelling mistake found.
reserches
that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
Possible spelling mistake found.
legfacy
systems have
been supplanted
by contemporary tools making our
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
easier ever
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
of the opinion that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
should fall within the ambit of the predefined fields should have a second
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
broden
their views.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Research
of any kind in such a way would be
purely
self-centered. Studies done
be reputed
universities and scientists are more in the interest of public or society
rather
than aimed at
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
person.
For instance
, all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
researches
done by NASA the American space
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
, have
greatly
contributed to humanity, as the outcomes of its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
have had a massive
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impact on all human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
around the world. Had it not been for such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
poor countries would
still
be in doldrums.

Moreover
, not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
human health,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it
also
addresses the well-being of animals and the mother nature. A myriad of fields such as agriculture, astronomy, social science, archaeology, literature, education and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
more are open for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
experiments and have great scope of improvements.

To sum-up, the intense
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
done by scholars and scientists in the right direction can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
us all in numerous ways. I,
thus
,
strongly
back that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
researches
should
be conducted
without any boundary, and not for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
personal enhancement. If science
Consider removing 'will'. (Usually, 'will' does not occur in a conditional clause, unless in the sense 'want to' or 'be willing to'.)
will not save
the world, what will? Rampant progress in science and technology will be the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
panacea to all the problems which plague mother earth.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Scientific research should be restricted to provide education and personal knowledge. Do you agree?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
290 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Scientific research should be restricted to provide education and personal knowledge. Do you agree?