There is an opinion asserting that due to the increasing university's tutations and limited job opportunities for graduated students, some artistic subjects, such as history and philosophy should not been taught in universities; instead, more practical majors should be offered to increase the employment opportunity. I am totally against this statement as I firmly believe that not paying proper attention to arts may lead to irreversible damages to human heritage and culture.
First and foremost, concidered as one of the intangible human heritages, arts have a direct assosiation with culture and history. This demonstares the importance of dedication and determination to preserve these uniqe cultural treasure, and not only university courses in arts are realy powerful mediators for the aforementioned purpose, but the best ways as well. In addition, without sufficient education and research in the arts subjects these parts of human knowledge would remain impotent and pron to be extinct. So, regardless the lack of sufficient job vacancy, these subjects merit attention.
However, limeted prospect of employment for graduates in art degrees is a reall cause of concern. Although it is a widespread problem amongst almost all students from different educational background, for art graduates this is a more serious one. Fortunately, this issue can be solved by official authorities throughout taking comprehencive strategies, such as funding and empowering related communities and organizations. in fact, if there were efficient policies, less unemployment rates would shown up in the future.
In conclusion, I totally agree that universities should teach arts subjects, and there is no justifiable reason not to do so, since reducing consideration to these majors can cause harmfull effects in human culture. Moreover, by adopting certain policies job prospects can improve.
There is an opinion asserting that due to the increasing university's
tutations
and limited job opportunities for graduated students,
some
artistic
subjects
, such as history and philosophy should not
been taught
in universities;
instead
, more practical majors should
be offered
to increase the employment opportunity. I am
totally
against this statement as I
firmly
believe that not paying proper attention to
arts
may lead to irreversible damages to
human
heritage and culture.
First
and foremost,
concidered
as one of the intangible
human
heritages,
arts
have a direct
assosiation
with culture and history. This
demonstares
the importance of dedication and determination to preserve these
uniqe
cultural treasure, and not
only
university courses in
arts
are
realy
powerful mediators for the aforementioned purpose,
but
the best ways
as well
.
In addition
, without sufficient education and research in the
arts
subjects
these parts of
human
knowledge would remain impotent and pron to be extinct.
So
, regardless the lack of sufficient job vacancy, these
subjects
merit attention.
However
,
limeted
prospect of employment for graduates in
art
degrees is a
reall
cause of concern. Although it is a widespread problem amongst almost all students from
different
educational background, for
art
graduates this is a more serious one.
Fortunately
, this issue can
be solved
by official authorities throughout taking
comprehencive
strategies, such as funding and empowering related communities and organizations.
in
fact, if there were efficient policies, less unemployment rates would
shown
up in the future.
In conclusion
, I
totally
agree
that universities should teach
arts
subjects
, and there is no justifiable reason not to do
so
, since reducing consideration to these majors can cause
harmfull
effects in
human
culture.
Moreover
, by adopting certain policies job prospects can
improve
.