Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Rembrandt painting dispute

Rembrandt painting dispute KVeX3
The reading and the lecturer are both about the Rembrandt painting. The author of the article presents three problems about the painting. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. Her position is that everything made in the article is true, yet there is some possibility that this work is done by the Rembrandt. First, the writer claims that their is problem with the women dress in the painting, because the women is wearing the cap, which is usually wear by the servants. Furthermore, It is stats that by the author that the coat is worn by the women is costly that servants can not afford. On the contrary, the lecturer mentions that during the examination it was observed that color in the painting painted superficially to enhance the painting cost by someone. Additionally, the professor maintains that the painting is originally painted by the Rembrandt. Second, the author asserts that Rembrandt has perfection in the light and shadow, nevertheless, these charecterstics contradict with the art of the Rembrandt. On top of that, he adds that the face is illuminated by the light refection, but below the collar face appeared dark. However, the lecturer calls this question into the argument that the when top paint from the face has been removed the paint of the face was bright in color and which was reflecting the light on the face, hence face was illuminating. Further, the lecturer remarks that the other body parts were looking dark. Finally, the author explains that after examination of the back of the painting it was observed that painting made of several wooden panels. In addition to this author asserts that Rembrandt paintings contains only single panel. On the other hand the lecture mentions that panel were glude so that painting can be stored for longer period.
The reading and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
are both about the Rembrandt
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
of the article presents three problems about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
disputes the claims made in the article. Her position is that everything made in the article is true,
yet
there is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
possibility that this work
is done
by the Rembrandt.

First
, the writer claims that
Did you mean "there"?
their
is problem with the women dress in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the women is wearing the cap, which is
usually
Consider using a past participle here: "worn".
wear
by the servants.
Furthermore
, It is stats that by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
that the coat
is worn
by the women is costly that servants can not afford.
On the contrary
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
mentions that during the examination it
was observed
that color in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
painted
superficially
to enhance the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
cost by someone.
Additionally
, the professor maintains that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
is
originally
painted by the Rembrandt.

Second, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
asserts that Rembrandt has perfection in the light and shadow,
nevertheless
, these
Possible spelling mistake found.
charecterstics
contradict with the art of the Rembrandt.
On top of that
, he
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
adds
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
is illuminated
by the light refection,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
below the collar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
appeared dark.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
calls this question into the argument that the when top paint from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
has
been removed
the paint of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
was
A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
bright in color
and which was reflecting the light on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
,
hence
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
was illuminating.
Further
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
remarks that the other body parts were looking dark.

Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that after examination of the back of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
it
was observed
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
made of several wooden panels.
In addition
to this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
asserts that Rembrandt
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
paintings
contains
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
single panel.
On the other hand
the lecture mentions that panel were
Possible spelling mistake found.
glude
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
painting
can
be stored
for longer period.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Rembrandt painting dispute

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
302 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Rembrandt painting dispute