Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In some countries like america and usa jury donot have access to criminals past record but some lawyers say that lawyers should have access to past facts Do you agree or disagree with this statement ?

In some countries like america and usa jury donot have access to criminals past record but some lawyers say that lawyers should have access to past facts j8N2X
Is it right approach to check the all past facts of a criminal? More often than not it is observed by many a man that jury should have access to defendant's past criminal record while other's counter and claim that jury should not be presented with the all history of a criminal. I agree with the former notion and will discuss my view points in upcoming paragraphs. To commence with, first and foremost, jury should have access to the past history of criminal because it not only give them the information about an individuals past but also give them an opportunity to know about the type of crimes which the individual has done in the past. If the jury membees have all details about the past of the criminal this will help them to carefully examine the matter and solve it in a frequent way. For instance, No sooner had my uncle checked the past history of their cook than their family saved themself from the crime. It means if people check the all details about the person's past they will get an idea about his personality. So, the fact is clear that jury members should check the history of defendants. Adding more to it, nowadays technology is growing at a very high rate. People make fake proofs with the help of computers and defend themselves and then the person who has not done anything became victim. So, in this way the wrong individual get indulge in the case. That's why if jury have access to past facts then they will examine that which type of crime a person can do. To exemplify: - In india, there is a verification of every worker working in any office to decrease the chance of crime. So, the fact is cemented that the past facts give the people details about the personality of an individual. To conclude, lawyers shouls check the past record of defendants this would help them to give a fair result.
Is it right approach to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
the all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
facts of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
? More
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
than not it
is observed
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
should have access to defendant's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
record while other's counter and claim that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
should not
be presented
with the all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
. I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the former notion and will discuss my view points in upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with,
first
and foremost,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
should have access to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
them the information about an individuals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
them an opportunity to know about the type of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crimes
which the individual has done in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
. If the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
Possible spelling mistake found.
membees
have all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
this will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
them to
carefully
examine the matter and solve it
Consider replacing "in a frequent way" with the adverb for "frequent"; e.g., "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
in a frequent way
.
For instance
, No sooner had my uncle
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
checked
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
of their cook than their family saved
The term is non-standard and not widely accepted.
themself
from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
. It means if
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
the all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
about the person's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
they will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
an
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
about his personality.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fact
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
members should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
of defendants.

Adding more to it, nowadays technology is growing at a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
high rate.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
fake proofs with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
of computers and defend themselves and then the person who has not done anything became victim.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, in this way the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
individual
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
indulge in the case. That's why if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
have access to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
facts then they will examine that which type of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
a person can do. To exemplify:
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
In
Possible spelling mistake found.
india
, there is a verification of every worker working in any office to decrease the chance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fact
is cemented
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
facts
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
If 'people' is plural here, don't use the third-person singular verb.
details
about the personality of an individual.

To conclude
, lawyers
Possible spelling mistake found.
shouls
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
record of defendants this would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
them to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
give
a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
result.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In some countries like america and usa jury donot have access to criminals past record but some lawyers say that lawyers should have access to past facts

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
331 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 5band
    Report on using Smartphone in Greenwich University.
    This report gives information about the tendency of using smartphone, which was conducted in August of this year. Three thousands students between the ages of 18 and 22 of Greenwich University asked for the smartphone habit. The survey found significant differences in the habits of freshman and fin...
  • 5band
    Foods affectiong our purschasing desicions changed why
    The importance of food in our lives is almost similar to the need of oxygen. Oxygen is necessary to produce energy while food is main source of nutrition. Before, price had an influence on food choices, however as the time passed, factors that affect the customer’s purchasing decisions changed. The ...
  • 6band
    Sentencing young people, who did illegal things
    Sentencing young people, who did illegal things, by arresting has been a contraversial idea over the years. Whereas there are a huge refussion to this idea globally and supportion to other ways, such as community service, to learn guilty youths rather than blame them, others resist that they are sti...
  • 5band
    Lamborghini Aventador Car
    Aventador is one of the most beautiful and fastest cars. It is one of my favorites cars because it has a 12 cylinder engine. This engine has a nice sound. It gives us 740 horsepower. Which is very high horsepower. It has a nice door which it open to upside. I hope to own it in the future, but I thin...
  • 5.5band
    Nowadays, many celebrities are using their fame to fundraise for charity. What are the pros and cons of this trend?
    these days, it seems that voluntary activities especially raising charitable money are much in vogue in the entertain superstar community. patently, this phenomenal brings about both ample advantages likewise disadvantages which will be discussed in this essay. there is absolutely a series of benefi...
  • 5.5band
    Write an essay on the topic " is the exploration of space worthwhile? "
    Over the past few years, the exploration of space has been one of the trendiest topics globally. Many people claim that it's a considerable consumption of resources and money but others argued that it is worthwhile. In this essay, I will elucidate that both groups have a point of view in their claim...





Get more results for topic:
  • In some countries like america and usa jury donot have access to criminals past record but some lawyers say that lawyers should have access to past facts Do you agree or disagree with this statement ?