The reading passage and the lecture are both about recently discovered paintings of a women in a white dress. The author mentions although it is not a signed painting but it is possible that it is another early work by famous American painter James McNeill Whistler. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that though the painting contributed to painter's friend but it is not by Whistler.
According to the reading passage, the painting was added in an exhibition after three years of Whistler's death. The article mentions that, that exhibition was arranged by Whistler's close friend who thought it was Whistler's work. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that the exhibition showcashed various other paintings done by other painters. Additionally, he points out that someone could make it look like it was painted by Whistler.
Secondly, the author suggests that the woman in the painting also look like the woman in another of his paintings. In the article, it is said that the painting distinctly similar to Whistler's later work which used monochoromatic palate identical to his most pamous painting: "Arrangement in Grey and Black". The lecturer, however, asserts that the woman in the painting was a popular modal who appered in other paintings. He goes on to say that the monochoromatic palate usage at that time in paintings was very popular too.
Finally the author posits that Whistler did not signed the painting but he drew a butterfly which Whistler painted in many other paintings. The author contends that
it was in the lower right corner of the painting. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that the bufferfly had different color, shape and the position of the butterfly was in lower right corner instead of upper left corner. He notes that someone could use it to make it look like his paintings.
The reading passage and the lecture are both about recently discovered
paintings
of
a women
in a white dress. The
author
mentions although it is not a signed
painting
but
it is possible that it is another early work by
famous
American painter James
McNeill
Whistler.
The
lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that though the
painting
contributed to painter's friend
but
it is not by Whistler.
According to the reading passage, the
painting
was
added
in an exhibition after three years of Whistler's death. The article mentions that, that exhibition
was arranged
by Whistler's close friend who
thought
it was Whistler's work. This argument
is challenged
by the lecturer. He claims that the exhibition
showcashed
various
other
paintings
done by
other
painters.
Additionally
, he points out that someone could
make
it look like it
was painted
by Whistler.
Secondly
, the
author
suggests that the woman in the
painting
also
look like the woman in another of his
paintings
. In the article, it
is said
that the
painting
distinctly
similar to Whistler's later work which
used
monochoromatic
palate identical to his most
pamous
painting
:
"
Arrangement in Grey and Black
"
. The lecturer,
however
, asserts that the woman in the
painting
was a popular modal who
appered
in
other
paintings
. He goes on to say that the
monochoromatic
palate usage at that time in
paintings
was
very
popular too.
Finally
the
author
posits that Whistler did not
signed
the
painting
but
he drew a butterfly which Whistler painted in
many
other
paintings
. The
author
contends that
it was in the lower right corner of the
painting
.
In contrast
, the lecturer's stance is that the
bufferfly
had
different
color, shape and the position of the butterfly was in lower right corner
instead
of upper
left
corner. He notes that someone could
use
it to
make
it look like his
paintings
.