With the ever-present concern for transportation, the issue of providing subsidies for faster vehicles has been much debated recently. Although many people are of the opinion that the state shall fund high-speed means of transport, I personally think they should put a priority on other matters.
On the one hand, the investment in faster vehicles can yield certain benefits. Firstly, this will help people save time by lessening the amount of commuting time. As a result, the problem of traffic congestion could be effectively solved leading to improved living conditions. If a person spends less time on the road, they would be available for other activities like pastimes or housework. Moreover, faster transports also facilitates the transportation industry due to the fact that these vehicles could significantly yield higher work efficiency. Take the plane as an example: before the invention of airplanes, it had taken one or two months to deliver merchandise to other countries.
On the other hand, I believe we shall consider other priorities for two prominent factors. To begin with, the energy-saving sector is a sustainable investment compared to speed because of the fact that the world has been exhausted of fossil fuel. And this source has been playing a crucial role in generating energy for an inordinate number of current vehicles. Moreover, conserving energy can result in alleviating pollution. Another more preferred selection is safety. The data for traffic deaths and injuries have rocketed nowadays; consequently, these incidents have either been imposing a strain on the government budget or caused impairment for society every year.
In conclusion, the higher-speed vehicles could render the community more convenient in some aspects; whereas, in my opinion, the funding should be distributed to more important factors.
With the ever-present concern for transportation, the issue of providing subsidies for faster
vehicles
has been much debated recently. Although
many
people
are of the opinion that the state shall fund high-speed means of transport, I
personally
think
they should put a priority on
other
matters.
On the one hand, the investment in faster
vehicles
can yield certain benefits.
Firstly
, this will
help
people
save time by lessening the amount of commuting time.
As a result
, the problem of traffic congestion could be
effectively
solved leading to
improved
living conditions. If a person spends less time on the road, they would be available for
other
activities like pastimes or housework.
Moreover
, faster transports
also
facilitates the transportation industry due to the fact that these
vehicles
could
significantly
yield higher work efficiency. Take the
plane
as an example:
before
the invention of airplanes, it had taken one or two months to deliver merchandise to
other
countries.
On the
other
hand, I believe we shall consider
other
priorities for two prominent factors. To
begin
with, the energy-saving sector is a sustainable investment compared to speed
because of the fact that
the world has
been exhausted
of fossil fuel. And this source has been playing a crucial role in generating energy for an inordinate number of
current
vehicles
.
Moreover
, conserving energy can result in alleviating pollution. Another more preferred selection is safety. The data for traffic deaths and injuries have rocketed nowadays;
consequently
, these incidents have either been imposing a strain on the
government
budget or caused impairment for society every year.
In conclusion
, the higher-speed
vehicles
could render the community more convenient in
some
aspects; whereas, in my opinion, the funding should
be distributed
to more
important
factors.