Professor argues that 5 day work employee is better than 4 day work employee.

The reading passage suggests that an employee is better off working 4 days because it can give more time to his family and friends. In addition to that, working 4 day causes the company to benefit from productivity an employee would have when he is relaxed. Moreover, such would boost employment rates by creating one job for every 4 previous 5-day employees. Although such number look really convincing, the professor casts some doubt on their actual validity. He claims that such benefits presented by reading are not only theoretical but are misleading. At first, Professor counters boost in employment idea by arguing that such hiring of more employee would cost the company some money on expenses like their training, workspace, insurance, etc. This argument assesses that the sole reason that was helping the company improve its profits is actually biased. Following his first argument, Professor argues that 4-day employee would be more unstable in his job due to being disconnected to his work for a longer period of time than before. This claim counters what the reading said about relaxation of employee: he/she would be more focused when relaxed. In summary, the professor provides a thorough analysis of the matter that reading was discussing, and claims that such reading has some serious flaws. He counters major arguments made in reading by his analysis and proposals.