Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic. Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence. You should write at least 250 words.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic. Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence. n0xP
There is some discussion that affluent people should help the poor and the governments should give a helping hand to their poorer inhabitants. Are these arguments ture? Around 50 years ago, people were not that rich as today. However, people can earn money by their hardworking. Some of them even get rich after 50 years' hardworking. Unfortunately, the margin between prosperity and poverty are obvious nowadays. Despite the fact that you are working as burning the candle on both ends, you still cannot exit from the poverty. As a result, rich people should always share resources to poor. It can be food. And some of them has been donating money to build schools, as we all know that knowledge can change life. Besides, the governments should help their citizens, too. A citiy is built up their inhabitants. There are some studies show that the depress ratio is invertly proportion to the affluent level of citizens. In addition, if the percentage of poorer nations increased, the number of crimes will also raise and the city will become unrest. Moreover, the local government should have their own policies to help their own poorer nations as outsider will only know part of the problems or even misunderstood the source of issue. Therefore, the local government should take the largest responsability to help its own citizens. To conclude, affluent people should have poorer nations as there are not enough chances for them to exit from poverty. In addition, the governments should also take the responsibility to take care of their own citizens.
There is
some
discussion that affluent
people
should
help
the poor and the
governments
should give a helping hand to their
poorer
inhabitants. Are these arguments
ture
?

Around 50 years ago,
people
were not that rich as
today
.
However
,
people
can earn money by their hardworking.
Some
of them even
get
rich after 50 years' hardworking. Unfortunately, the margin between prosperity and poverty are obvious nowadays. Despite the fact that you are working as burning the candle on both ends, you
still
cannot exit from the poverty.
As a result
, rich
people
should always share resources to poor. It can be food. And
some
of them has been donating money to build schools, as we all know that knowledge can
change
life.

Besides
, the
governments
should
help
their citizens, too. A
citiy
is built
up their inhabitants. There are
some
studies
show
that
the depress
ratio is
invertly
proportion to the affluent level of citizens.
In addition
, if the percentage of
poorer
nations increased, the number of crimes will
also
raise and the city will become unrest.
Moreover
, the local
government
should have their
own
policies to
help
their
own
poorer
nations as outsider will
only
know part of the problems or even misunderstood the source of issue.
Therefore
, the local
government
should take the largest
responsability
to
help
its
own
citizens.

To conclude
, affluent
people
should have
poorer
nations as there are not
enough
chances for them to exit from poverty.
In addition
, the
governments
should
also
take the responsibility to take care of their
own
citizens.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic. Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
258 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: