NO ONE WOULD DENY THAT PLASTIC BAGS WHICH ARE USED IN SHOPS AND SUPERMARKETS HAVE DAMAGING EFFECTS ON THE LAND AND WATER. AS A RESULT, MANY PEOPLE ARE ADVOCATING FOR THEIR BAN. ON THE CONTRARY, I THINK NYLON SHOPPING BAGS SHOULD NOT BE BANNED BECAUSE THE REPLACEMENT FOR THESE BAGS CARRY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL RISK.
THE MAIN PROBLEM CAUSED BY NYLON BAGS IS THAT THEY DO NOT DEGRADE AND EVENTUALLY END UP AS LITTER IN OUR CITIES AND OCEANS. AN INSIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PEOPLE MAY REUSE OR RECYCLE NYLON BAGS BUT MOST ULTIMATELY LITTER OR TOSS THEM IN THE TRASH. IF THEY ARE THROWN IN THE TRASH, THESE BAGS WILL END UP IN THE EVER-INCREASING LANDFILLS CAUSING AN INEVITABLE SOIL POLLUTION. THOSE BAGS THAT ARE LITTERED WILL WIND UP IN THE CITIES CAUSING ENVIRONMENTAL NUISSANCE OR CLOG THE DRAINS WHICH MAY END UP IN THE SEAS THEREBY ENTANGLING MARINE LIFE. FOR EXAMPLE, IN 2003, A STUDY CARRIED OUT BY OXFORD UNIVERSITY REPORTED THAT 67% OF MARINE DEATH IS CAUSED BY SUFFOCATION BY POLYTHENE BAGS.
DESPITE THE ADVANTAGES OF BANNING POLYTHENE BAGS, THEIR REPLACEMENT CAN CAUSE MANY ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS. ALTHOUGH SOME CRITICS ADVOCATE FOR THE USE OF PAPER BAGS WHICH ARE BIODEGRADABLE, PAPER PRODUCTION WHICH REQUIRES CONSTANT CLEARING OF BUSHES WILL FINALLY LEAD TO DEFORESTATION. CONSEQUENTLY, THIS WILL DISRUPT THE ECOSYSTEM BY DECREASING FOOD PRODUCTION. THAT IS TO SAY THAT WHEN THE TREES ARE OFTEN CUT, THERE WILL BE A DECLINE IN THE POPULATION OF USEFUL FARM INSECTS SUCH AS BEES, BUTTERFLIES AND PRAYING MANTIS BECAUSE THE ENVIRONMENT WILL NO LONGER BE CONDUCIVE FOR THEM TO THRIVE. FOR INSTANCE, A RECENT STUDY BY YORK DALE UNIVERSITY FOUND THAT CONSTANT FALLING OF TREES IS LINKED WITH 48% DECLINE IN AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT.
IN CONCLUSION, I BELIEVE THAT PLASTIC SHOPPING BAGS SHOULD NOT BE BANNED BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE TO THESE BAGS POSES A GREATER RISK ON THE ECONOMY. THE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY MAKERS SHOULD DO MORE AND FORMULATE A POLICY THAT WILL ENCOURAGE REUSING OR RECYCLING OF PLASTIC BAGS.
NO ONE WOULD DENY THAT PLASTIC
BAGS
WHICH ARE
USED
IN SHOPS AND SUPERMARKETS HAVE DAMAGING EFFECTS ON THE LAND AND WATER.
AS A RESULT
,
MANY
PEOPLE
ARE ADVOCATING FOR THEIR BAN.
ON THE CONTRARY
, I
THINK
NYLON SHOPPING
BAGS
SHOULD NOT
BE BANNED
BECAUSE
THE REPLACEMENT FOR THESE
BAGS
CARRY SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL
RISK
.
THE MAIN PROBLEM CAUSED BY NYLON
BAGS
IS THAT THEY DO NOT DEGRADE AND
EVENTUALLY
END
UP AS LITTER IN OUR CITIES AND OCEANS. AN INSIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF
PEOPLE
MAY REUSE OR RECYCLE NYLON
BAGS
BUT
MOST
ULTIMATELY
LITTER OR TOSS THEM IN THE TRASH. IF THEY
ARE THROWN
IN THE TRASH, THESE
BAGS
WILL
END
UP IN THE EVER-INCREASING LANDFILLS CAUSING AN INEVITABLE SOIL POLLUTION. THOSE
BAGS
THAT
ARE LITTERED
WILL WIND UP IN THE CITIES CAUSING
ENVIRONMENTAL
NUISSANCE
OR CLOG THE DRAINS WHICH MAY
END
UP IN THE SEAS THEREBY ENTANGLING MARINE LIFE.
FOR EXAMPLE
, IN 2003, A STUDY CARRIED OUT BY OXFORD UNIVERSITY REPORTED THAT 67% OF MARINE DEATH
IS CAUSED
BY SUFFOCATION BY POLYTHENE BAGS.
DESPITE THE ADVANTAGES OF BANNING POLYTHENE
BAGS
, THEIR REPLACEMENT CAN CAUSE
MANY
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROBLEMS. ALTHOUGH
SOME
CRITICS ADVOCATE FOR THE
USE
OF PAPER
BAGS
WHICH ARE BIODEGRADABLE, PAPER PRODUCTION WHICH REQUIRES CONSTANT CLEARING OF BUSHES WILL
FINALLY
LEAD TO DEFORESTATION.
CONSEQUENTLY
, THIS WILL DISRUPT THE ECOSYSTEM BY DECREASING FOOD PRODUCTION.
THAT IS
TO SAY THAT WHEN THE TREES ARE
OFTEN
CUT
, THERE WILL BE A DECLINE IN THE POPULATION OF USEFUL FARM INSECTS SUCH AS BEES, BUTTERFLIES AND PRAYING MANTIS
BECAUSE
THE ENVIRONMENT WILL NO LONGER BE CONDUCIVE FOR THEM TO THRIVE.
FOR INSTANCE
, A RECENT STUDY BY YORK DALE UNIVERSITY FOUND THAT CONSTANT FALLING OF TREES
IS LINKED
WITH 48% DECLINE IN AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT.
IN CONCLUSION
, I BELIEVE THAT PLASTIC SHOPPING
BAGS
SHOULD NOT
BE BANNED
BECAUSE
THE ALTERNATIVE TO THESE
BAGS
POSES A GREATER
RISK
ON THE ECONOMY. THE
ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY MAKERS SHOULD DO MORE AND FORMULATE A POLICY THAT WILL ENCOURAGE REUSING OR RECYCLING OF PLASTIC
BAGS
.