The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about the possibility of human life on Venus. In this regard, the author claims that the conditions on Venus are harsh and cannot maintain the presence of human. However, the lecturer posits that although living on the surface of Venus is challenging, it is plausible through the use of a station which is floating above 50 kilometers above the surface. Hence, the speaker provides three explanations to solve the problems mentioned in the text.
Firstly, both the passage and the lecture discuss about Venus's atmospheric pressure. In this regard, the writer declares that the Venus extreme pressure will lead to the destruction of all spacecraft. But, according to the speaker, this problem can be solved by establishing a floating station. Indeed, the lecturer states that pressure at 50 kilometers above Venus's surface is equal to earth's atmospheric pressure. Therefore, there will be no danger of spaceship crushing.
Secondly, both text and talk discuss around the idea of water resources on Venus. In this regard, the author mentions that there are no water reservoirs on Venus's surface. Therefore, it is not feasible to establish a permanent station on Venus. The lecturer, on the other hand, points out the existence of chemical material that can be used to make water. therefore, there is no problem with supply of water on the Venus
At last, both the reading and listening materials discuss about sunlight shortage on Venus. While the writer claims that very little light reaches the surface due to the presence of thick clouds and a dense layer of carbon dioxide, the lecturer refutes this claim. He explains that although there is a cloud at 50 kilometers above Venus's surface, it is not thick enough to prevent sunlight. Moreover, the reflected sunlight from the dense layer below the station can be used to produce even more electricity. Therefore humans can get make enough electricity to power their equipment.
The main
idea
of both the passage and the talk is about the possibility of human life on
Venus
. In this regard, the author claims that the conditions on
Venus
are harsh and cannot maintain the presence of human.
However
, the
lecturer
posits that although living on the
surface
of
Venus
is challenging, it is plausible through the
use
of a
station
which is floating
above
50 kilometers
above
the
surface
.
Hence
, the speaker provides three explanations to solve the problems mentioned in the text.
Firstly
, both the passage and the lecture discuss about
Venus's
atmospheric
pressure
. In this regard, the writer declares that the
Venus
extreme
pressure
will lead to the destruction of all spacecraft.
But
, according to the speaker, this problem can
be solved
by establishing a floating
station
.
Indeed
, the
lecturer
states that
pressure
at 50 kilometers
above
Venus's
surface
is equal to earth's atmospheric
pressure
.
Therefore
, there will be no
danger
of spaceship crushing.
Secondly
, both text and talk discuss around the
idea
of
water
resources on
Venus
. In this regard, the author mentions that there are no
water
reservoirs on
Venus's
surface
.
Therefore
, it is not feasible to establish a permanent
station
on
Venus
. The
lecturer
,
on the other hand
, points out the existence of chemical material that can be
used
to
make
water
.
therefore
, there is no problem with supply of
water
on the Venus
At last, both the reading and listening materials
discuss about sunlight
shortage on
Venus
. While the writer claims that
very
little
light reaches the
surface
due to the presence of thick clouds and a dense layer of carbon dioxide, the
lecturer
refutes this claim. He
explains
that although there is a cloud at 50 kilometers
above
Venus's
surface
, it is not thick
enough
to
prevent
sunlight.
Moreover
, the reflected sunlight from the dense layer below the
station
can be
used
to produce even more electricity.
Therefore
humans can
get
make
enough
electricity to power their equipment.