Children are mostly bought up with a set of rules and regulations around them which are imposed by their parents and tutors in order to make them well-behaving individual and to safeguard from any dangers. A few people believe that kids will be happy if fewer restrictions are imposed on them and more liberation is given. I agree with the argument that juveniles deserve more freedom; however, they should be monitored and made to follow the ordinances that are set out for them.
Firstly, children too undergo tension and problems. When they are granted independence they have the opportunity to talk about their problems with their parents and teachers. For instance, today kids enjoy more freedom with their guardians and they talk about things openly. Since they are offered this freedom we get to know what problems they face and we can guide them on their issues. Whereas, when children do not have the freedom to express their problems with their parents they go into depression because they are worried and scared.
Secondly, too much restriction will indeed have a pessimistic impact on children psychologically. Likewise, whenever they are caged more and more, they develop a rebellious attitude within themselves which might burst out in future. For example, there was an incident in the newspaper, where a teenage kid was denied a mobile phone for several days to play. As a result, the child in anger left the house and lost the way while coming back home. Hence, once kids are tied up there is a high chance that they take extreme steps which parents and teachers will have to regret later. Hence, a few necessary rules and greater emancipation will help the overall benefit of an individual from childhood.
In conclusion, it is true that we can not give total freedom to kids, as they do not know what is good or bad for them. According to my opinion, fewer desirable rules and greater freedom serve the purpose of shaping the child into a good individual.
Children
are
mostly
bought
up with a set of
rules
and regulations around them which
are imposed
by their
parents
and tutors in order to
make
them well-behaving individual and to
safeguard from
any
dangers
. A few
people
believe that
kids
will be happy if fewer restrictions
are imposed
on them and more liberation is
given
. I
agree
with the argument that juveniles deserve more
freedom
;
however
, they should
be monitored
and made to follow the ordinances that
are set
out for them.
Firstly
,
children
too undergo
tension and
problems
. When they
are granted
independence they have the opportunity to talk about their
problems
with their
parents
and teachers.
For instance
,
today
kids
enjoy more
freedom
with their
guardians and
they talk about things
openly
. Since they
are offered
this
freedom
we
get
to know what
problems
they
face and
we can guide them on their issues. Whereas, when
children
do not have the
freedom
to express their
problems
with their
parents
they go into depression
because
they
are worried
and scared.
Secondly
, too much restriction will
indeed
have a pessimistic impact on
children
psychologically
.
Likewise
, whenever they
are caged
more and more, they develop a rebellious attitude within themselves which might burst out
in future
.
For example
, there was an incident in the newspaper, where a teenage
kid
was denied
a mobile phone for several days to play.
As a result
, the child in anger
left
the
house
and lost the way while coming back home.
Hence
, once
kids
are tied
up there is a high chance that they take extreme steps which
parents
and teachers will
have to
regret later.
Hence
, a few necessary
rules
and greater emancipation will
help
the
overall
benefit of an individual from childhood.
In conclusion
, it is true that we can not give total
freedom
to
kids
, as they do not know what is
good
or
bad
for them. According to my opinion, fewer desirable
rules
and greater
freedom
serve the purpose of shaping the child into a
good
individual.