Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They

Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 3agVJ
The passage states that a culinary recipe is good for our heath becaus of certain nutrients within bones is beneficial to us and that there is anecdotal evidence. However, the argument is not sound because it is missing some information to substantiate it. To be specific, it should provide evidence about chondroitin and cartilage to corroborate the notions of the proposition or the opposition. Moreover, anecdotal evidence is not enough to prove that these recipies are truly efficient, and concluding that ancient humans possessed more knowledge than the contemporary humans are absurd. First of all, there is not scientific proof that shows the effects of chondroitin or cartilage. If the passaged adduced experimental results from scientific papers, either the advocates or dissidents would have been cogent. However, neither sides presents evidence and thus there is the possibility of other conclusions such as cartilage rather than repleteing the substance in one's knees, could help alleviate the pain felt in the joints. Hence, more information about the relationship between theses substances and their effects are needed. Next, the passage presents anecdotal evidence as proof that this diet is salubrious for people, which however, could be the result of exterior influences rather than the diet itself. For instance, people practicing this diet could usually be vegitarians and bone eating is their supplant way of protein intake. In this case, the propitious health conditions could have resulted from the vegetarian diet, not from the substances innate in the paleo diets. Consequently, for this aphorism to be accepted, there should be more information regarding that other than this special food intake, the people practicing this diet does not have any abnormalities, or scientific evidence regarding this issue. Finally, the conclusion that the passage makes in the end is illogical. Even if cartilage and chondroitin is healthy to us, it does not mean that our ancestors were more informed about our physiology. This food could have been the result of extreme frugality: in our ancestors endeavor to eat anything that could be digested due to the desultory food sources. In addition, imitating them could not be helpful in curing inveterate disease because of the change in physiology from our ancient form. What could have been a good source of nutritions could have become a source of poison for our bodies. In conclusion, the passage needs to provide additional proof to reinforce it's asseverations. It should provide scientific evidence about the substances that seem salubrious, and objective proof rather than a story to be coherent. Last but not least, it should elucidate on how it reached the conclusion that our ancestors had profound knowledge that contemporary humans doesn't.
The
passage
states that a culinary recipe is
good
for our heath
becaus
of certain nutrients within bones is beneficial to us and that there is anecdotal
evidence
.
However
, the argument is not sound
because
it is missing
some
information to substantiate it. To be specific, it should provide
evidence
about chondroitin and cartilage to corroborate the notions of the proposition or the opposition.
Moreover
, anecdotal
evidence
is not
enough
to prove that these
recipies
are
truly
efficient, and concluding that ancient humans possessed more knowledge than the contemporary humans are absurd.

First of all
, there is not
scientific
proof
that
shows
the effects of chondroitin or cartilage. If the
passaged
adduced experimental results from
scientific
papers, either the advocates or dissidents would have been cogent.
However
, neither sides presents
evidence
and
thus
there is the possibility of other
conclusions
such as cartilage
rather
than
repleteing
the
substance
in one's knees, could
help
alleviate the pain felt in the joints.
Hence
, more information about the relationship between
theses
substances
and their effects
are needed
.

Next
, the
passage
presents anecdotal
evidence
as
proof
that this diet is salubrious for
people
, which
however
, could be the result of exterior influences
rather
than the diet itself.
For instance
,
people
practicing this diet could
usually
be
vegitarians
and bone eating is their supplant way of protein intake.
In this case
, the propitious health conditions could have resulted from the vegetarian diet, not from the
substances
innate in the paleo diets.
Consequently
, for this aphorism to be
accepted
, there should be more information regarding that other than this special food intake, the
people
practicing this diet does not have any abnormalities, or
scientific
evidence
regarding this issue.

Finally
, the
conclusion
that the
passage
makes
in the
end
is illogical. Even if cartilage and chondroitin is healthy to us, it does not mean that our ancestors were more informed about our physiology. This food could have been the result of extreme frugality: in our ancestors endeavor to eat anything that could
be digested
due to the desultory food sources.
In addition
, imitating them could not be helpful in curing inveterate disease
because
of the
change
in physiology from our ancient form. What could have been a
good
source of
nutritions
could have become a source of poison for our bodies.

In
conclusion
, the
passage
needs to provide additional
proof
to reinforce it's asseverations
. It should provide
scientific
evidence
about the
substances
that seem salubrious, and objective
proof
rather
than a story to be coherent. Last
but
not least, it should elucidate on how it reached the
conclusion
that our ancestors had profound knowledge that contemporary humans doesn't.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
441 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6band
    INtegrated essay in toefl quick prep " About Chevalier de seingalt's memoir"
    Reading states that long memoir written by Chevalier de Seingalt is not accurate. Reading explains the doubts raised by some critics. They claim that he introduced many events that were not really happened in his life. But the professor in the lecture cast doubt on the reading. First of all, lectur...
  • 5.5band
    what all are necessary to get good health
    “Health is wealth” is a famous quote used to said by our elders. Health makes to stay happy, comfortable and peaceful. Unluckily, in modern days, increased industrialization and urbanization causes health problems due to increased use of vehicles in turn causes increased pollution and fumes. In this...
  • 6band
    Integrated essay from ETS official guide to toefl test ''Doubts on Rembrandt painting"
    The reading states that painting known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet is not really painted by Rembrandt, a famous Dutch painter. Reading explains the reasons for it. In the lecture, the professor explains that it was painted by Rembrandt only, but there are some corrections made ...
  • 6band
    It is better to have one or two close friends than to have a large number of casual acquaintences.
    Just imagine the world without friends, it’s horrible, right? “Friend forever”. We can’t just live without friends. In my point of view it is better to have one or two close friends than more casual friends. I have several reasons to support my view. First of all, to know each other very well, ther...
  • 6band
    Wind power
    The reading and lesson discuss the topic of wind power. The professor cast doubt on the disadvantages of wind power as they are presented in reading passage. To begin with, the professor explain that most of the migration birds are being killed by winter season, high buildings and the pollution by ...
  • 6band
    people behave different when they wear different clothes. give reasons and example
    Clothes are one of the essential need for everyone. Clothes may different that means depending on the people, countries, cultures the way people dressed may vary. I believe that our behavior depends on the clothes. Many people say when we see a person that persons appearance will reflect on mind fi...





Get more results for topic: