finitely agree with the statement that once children get admission in school, teachers have more
impact on them than even their parents. A number of arguments surround my opinion.
To begin with, children spend quality time with teachers. Although they spend more time with parents at
home but this time is not as productive as the small amount of time spent with teachers. We all know that
parents are busy with their work most of the time and even if children are around, they hardly pay any
attention to them. Teachers, on the other hand are in school for the students. All the time they are either
teaching the students or guiding them in extra -cu rricu la r activities. They keep children focused on study
and as a result have more intellectual impact on them.
What is more, teachers are role models for students. They are scholars in action. They not only influence
intellectually but socially. Students inadvertently follow their teachers' behaviour too. They observe how
the teacher walks, talks and tackles difficult situations. At home they have parents to guide them socially,
but it is seen that in nuclear families, parents hardly find time for this. Whatever social skills children learn
are from TV or other activities they do at home. So definitely teachers have an edge over parents even as
far as social skills are concerned.
Teachers also guide students for their future careers. Students follow teachers more than parents because
they feel that teachers are more aware of the world around them and they have better capability of
guiding them. So, they depend on teachers more than parents.
To conclude, it can be said that once the schooling starts, teachers and parents both have influence but teachers influence children more.
finitely
agree
with the statement that once
children
get
admission in school,
teachers
have more
impact on them than even their
parents
. A number of arguments surround my opinion.
To
begin
with,
children
spend quality
time
with
teachers
. Although they spend more
time
with
parents
at
home
but
this
time
is not as productive as the
small
amount of
time
spent with
teachers
. We all know that
parents are busy with their work most of the
time
and even if
children
are around, they hardly pay any
attention to them.
Teachers
,
on the other hand
are in school for the
students
. All the
time
they are either
teaching the
students
or guiding them in extra -cu
rricu
la r activities. They
keep
children
focused on study
and
as a result
have more intellectual impact on them.
What is more
,
teachers
are role models for
students
. They are scholars in action. They not
only
influence
intellectually
but
socially
.
Students
inadvertently
follow their teachers'
behaviour
too. They observe how
the
teacher
walks, talks and tackles difficult situations. At
home they
have
parents
to guide them
socially
,
but
it is
seen
that in nuclear families,
parents
hardly find
time
for this. Whatever social
skills
children
learn
are from TV or other activities they do at home.
So
definitely
teachers
have an edge over
parents
even as
far as social
skills
are concerned
.
Teachers
also
guide
students
for their future careers.
Students
follow
teachers
more than
parents
because
they feel that
teachers
are more aware of the world around
them and
they have better capability of
guiding them.
So
, they depend on
teachers
more than parents.
To conclude
, it can
be said
that once the schooling
starts
,
teachers
and
parents
both have influence
but
teachers
influence
children
more.