Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fallout, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In short, the benefits of nuclear power far outweigh the risks of using it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fallout, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In short, the benefits of nuclear power far outweigh the risks of using it. K6ow

It is frequently argued that advantages of nuclear power predominate over dangers of using it. Although nuclear energy has certain benefit, its drawback cannot be neglected. On the one hand, nuclear energy seems to be advantageous since it is an authentic alternative to traditional energy sources. Meaning that, this power is able to replace sources like oil and coal, which are entailed at certain times. This is mainly because nuclear energy is considerably cheaper than any other energy sources. For example, if we use nuclear energy instead of oil and coal, we are likely to economise our money. Thereby, the following energy is more affordable than other ones. On the other hand, nuclear power is hardly to be considered as benefit because of its danger for human life. In other words, nuclear energy has the probabilities to be exploded. This means that, if we do not save our environment and people's lives, this innovation will be necessary for no-one. For instance, a majority of people do not forget the nasty event which was in Chernobyl many years ago where the nuclear power station blew up and became the reason of many people's death. Therefore, nuclear energy is genuinely dangerous for human life. In conclusion, nuclear power appears to be both negative and positive.

It is frequently
 argued that advantages of nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 predominate over This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsrisks
dangers
 of using it. Although nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 has certain benefit, its drawback cannot be neglected
. On the one hand, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 seems to be advantageous since it is an authentic alternative to traditional You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 sources. Meaning that, this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 is able to replace sources like oil and coal, which are entailed
 at certain times. This is mainly
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is considerably
 cheaper than any You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 sources. For example
, if we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
instead
 of oil and coal, we are likely to Possible spelling mistake. 'economise' is British English.economize
economise
 our money. Thereby, the following You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is more affordable than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 ones. On the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hand, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 is hardly to be considered
 as benefit This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of its This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
 for human life. In You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 words, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 has the probabilities to be exploded
. This means that, if we do not save our environment and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
, this innovation will be necessary for no-one. For instance
, a majority of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 do not forget the nasty This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :occasionhappening
event
 which was in Chernobyl This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 years ago where the nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 station blew up and became the reason of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's death. Therefore
, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is genuinely
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 for human life. In conclusion
, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 appears to be both This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
. 