Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

not a good idea and shoud be banned. while others are of opine that the vital scientific innovation can be possible from animal experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion

not a good idea and shoud be banned. while others are of opine that the vital scientific innovation can be possible from animal experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion OVR8d

Experimenting on animals has become a burning issue in recent times. Some individual think that all experiments on animals is not a good idea and shoud be banned. while others are of opine that the vital scientific innovation can be possible from animal experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion. To begin with, some school of thought believes that the practicals made on animals is bad and should be restricted. These people have reasons because it might create life-cycle imbalance among wild-life species and have a chance of extinction. This not affects animals but also to the humans. For instance, many dragon flies in Africa are hunted, trying to make medicine out of it. The insects, which is the primary source of food for flies destroyed the human crops. If one of the species in life-cycle chain is disturbed, it can affect all the others too. Therefore, these persons believe that this should be banned. On the other hand, some holds the view of experiments on animals can bring scientific advancements. This is in fact true because the practicals can be made on wild life species before implementing on real life scenarios. For example, many vaccines for deadly diseases are initially made on animals before applying on humans. Thus, this can have a positive impact on the innovation and research purposes. To conclude, some argue that experimenting on animals should be banned because of the repercussions on environment while other thinks that the innovations can be done for the advancements. Personally, I believe this can be justified for the animals whose population is more rather than implementing on species under danger of extinction.

Experimenting on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 has become a burning issue in recent times. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 individual This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that all experiments on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is not a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 and Possible spelling mistake found.shouldshoutshroudSOUDshod
shoud
be banned
. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterWhile
while
 others are of opine that Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphthe.the!the?the:the,the;
the


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterVital
vital
 scientific innovation can be possible from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 school of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 believes that the practicals made on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evil
bad
 and should be restricted
. These This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 have reasons This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it might create life-cycle imbalance Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphamong.among!among?among:among,among;
among


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterWild-life
wild-life
 species and have a chance of extinction. This not affects You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 to the humans. For instance
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 dragon flies in Africa are hunted
, trying to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 medicine out of it. The insects, which is the primary source of food for flies This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishedruined
destroyed
 the human crops. If one of the species in life-cycle chain is disturbed
, it can affect all the others too. Therefore
, these persons believe that this should be banned
.

On the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hand, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 holds the view of experiments on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 can bring scientific advancements. This is in fact true This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the practicals can be made
 on wild life species Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphbefore.before!before?before:before,before;
before


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterImplementing
implementing
 on real life scenarios. For example
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 vaccines for deadly diseases are initially
 made on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 applying on humans. Thus
, this can have a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 impact on the innovation and research purposes.

To conclude
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 argue that experimenting on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should be banned
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the repercussions on environment while You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonsassumesbelievesconsiders
thinks
 that the innovations can be done
 for the advancements. Personally
, I believe this can be justified
 for the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 whose population is more rather
 than implementing on species under This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
 of extinction. 