Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

not a good idea and shoud be banned. while others are of opine that the vital scientific innovation can be possible from animal experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion

not a good idea and shoud be banned. while others are of opine that the vital scientific innovation can be possible from animal experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion OVR8d
Experimenting on animals has become a burning issue in recent times. Some individual think that all experiments on animals is not a good idea and shoud be banned. while others are of opine that the vital scientific innovation can be possible from animal experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion. To begin with, some school of thought believes that the practicals made on animals is bad and should be restricted. These people have reasons because it might create life-cycle imbalance among wild-life species and have a chance of extinction. This not affects animals but also to the humans. For instance, many dragon flies in Africa are hunted, trying to make medicine out of it. The insects, which is the primary source of food for flies destroyed the human crops. If one of the species in life-cycle chain is disturbed, it can affect all the others too. Therefore, these persons believe that this should be banned. On the other hand, some holds the view of experiments on animals can bring scientific advancements. This is in fact true because the practicals can be made on wild life species before implementing on real life scenarios. For example, many vaccines for deadly diseases are initially made on animals before applying on humans. Thus, this can have a positive impact on the innovation and research purposes. To conclude, some argue that experimenting on animals should be banned because of the repercussions on environment while other thinks that the innovations can be done for the advancements. Personally, I believe this can be justified for the animals whose population is more rather than implementing on species under danger of extinction.
Experimenting on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
has become a burning issue in recent times.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
individual
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that all experiments on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
shoud
be banned
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
while
others are of opine that
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
the


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
vital
scientific innovation can be possible from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
school of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
believes that the practicals made on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bad
and should
be restricted
. These
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
have reasons
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it might create life-cycle imbalance
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
among


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
wild-life
species and have a chance of extinction. This not affects
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
to the humans.
For instance
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
dragon flies in Africa
are hunted
, trying to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
medicine out of it. The insects, which is the primary source of food for flies
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
the human crops. If one of the species in life-cycle chain
is disturbed
, it can affect all the others too.
Therefore
, these persons believe that this should
be banned
.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
holds the view of experiments on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
can bring scientific advancements. This is in fact true
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the practicals can
be made
on wild life species
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
before


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
implementing
on real life scenarios.
For example
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
vaccines for deadly diseases are
initially
made on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
applying on humans.
Thus
, this can have a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impact on the innovation and research purposes.

To conclude
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
argue that experimenting on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
be banned
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the repercussions on environment while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thinks
that the innovations can
be done
for the advancements.
Personally
, I believe this can
be justified
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
whose population is more
rather
than implementing on species under
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
danger
of extinction.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his own language, that goes to his heart.
Nelson Mandela

IELTS essay not a good idea and shoud be banned. while others are of opine that the vital scientific innovation can be possible from animal experiments. This will discuss both sides of the argument and will give a plausible conclusion

Essay
  American English
7 paragraphs
281 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts