there is no doubt that internet provide an amazing experience when its comes to know what happend in the world; as result, there are people who argue that internet could have an effect on newspaper reader. from my own opinion, online platforms provide an faboulas way to reach information and news, and it could easly replace the traditional ways.
in the first side of argument, internet have been prove that it is the future of information sence it is smooth to use, easy to reach and cheap for users. moreover, that when one looking for instant news, he could find it in short time by online online platform such as google and yahoo. futhermore, the internet could be more frindly frindly with enviroment because there is no use for paper like what in magazine ofline methods.
from another point of view, there are members who argue that the traditional ways better than new one, because it could be more save for the eyes sence looking to devices screen for long time could cause eyes trouble. yet, the ofline method proved that it more reliable than online sence there is no premition for any one to write in it. for example, magazine and newspaper. eventually, the peaper method could not be replaced easly and its need more change to disappear.
in the end, we could say that the both have advantages and disadvantges, but internet is the futere; and we have to be familiar with it.
there
is no doubt
that internet provide
an amazing experience when its
comes
to know what
happend
in the world; as result, there are
people
who argue that internet could have an effect on newspaper reader.
from
my
own
opinion,
online
platforms provide
an
faboulas
way to reach information and news, and it could
easly
replace the traditional ways.
in
the
first
side of argument, internet have been
prove
that it is the future of information
sence
it is smooth to
use
, easy to reach and
cheap
for users.
moreover
, that when one looking for instant news, he could find it in short time by
online
online
platform such as google and yahoo.
futhermore
, the internet could be more
frindly
frindly
with
enviroment
because
there is no
use
for paper like what in magazine
ofline
methods.
from
another point of view, there are members who argue that the traditional ways better than new one,
because
it could be more save for the eyes
sence
looking to devices screen for long time could cause eyes trouble.
yet
, the
ofline
method proved that
it
more reliable than
online
sence
there is no
premition
for
any one
to write in it.
for example
, magazine and newspaper.
eventually
, the
peaper
method could not
be replaced
easly
and its need more
change
to disappear.
in
the
end
, we could say that the both have advantages and
disadvantges
,
but
internet is the
futere
; and we
have to
be familiar with it.