Many people claim that it is more important for museums to display work from the country where they are located rather than draw from other places around the world. I partly agree that museums are a valuable educational tool to learn about one’s own country but overall museums should aspire to broaden people’s perspective rather than narrow and deepen it.
Proponents of museums mainly showcasing works from their own country often point out that they help people connect with their country’s culture and history. Children all over the United States learn about American history from their textbooks. They learn about the constitution, the founding fathers, and the various wars of liberation America has fought. However, if they go to a museum to see the actual historical documents from the period this will likely have a more memorable impression. Seeing a famous work of art or historical document up close, they may notice notice details that were not in their book and feel a more personal connection to their country.
Although there is a strong argument to be made for museums specialising in this way, I feel it is more important for people to gain a broader view of cultures around the world. Most people cannot afford to travel abroad and even if they do, they are unlikely to experience another culture deeply as a tourist. Museums are a great opportunity for people of all ages to learn about other countries. Someone visiting the British Museum in London will see artifacts from every continent in the world without a plane ticket. Over the years if they keep returning to the museum they will learn more and more.
Museums will inevitable show a mixture of works from their own country as well as other countries. In my opinion, it is more important for people to take in the breadth of culture of the whole world rather than just their country. If children start from a young age learning about the world they are likely to grow up more tolerant.
Many
people
claim that it is more
important
for
museums
to display
work
from the
country
where they
are located
rather
than draw from other places around the
world
. I partly
agree
that
museums
are a valuable educational tool to
learn
about one’s
own
country
but
overall
museums
should aspire to broaden
people’s
perspective
rather
than narrow and deepen it.
Proponents of
museums
mainly
showcasing works from their
own
country
often
point out that they
help
people
connect with their
country’s
culture
and history. Children all over the United States
learn
about American history from their textbooks. They
learn
about the constitution, the founding fathers, and the various wars of liberation America has fought.
However
, if they go to a
museum
to
see
the actual historical documents from the period this will likely have a more memorable impression. Seeing a
famous
work
of art or historical document up close, they may
notice notice
details
that were not in their book and feel a more personal connection to their country.
Although there is a strong argument to
be made
for
museums
specialising
in this way, I feel it is more
important
for
people
to gain a broader view of
cultures
around the
world
. Most
people
cannot afford to travel abroad and even if they do, they are unlikely to experience another
culture
deeply
as a tourist.
Museums
are a great opportunity for
people
of all ages to
learn
about other
countries
. Someone visiting the British
Museum
in London will
see
artifacts from every continent in the
world
without a
plane
ticket. Over the years if they
keep
returning to the
museum
they will
learn
more and more.
Museums will inevitable
show
a mixture of works from their
own
country
as well
as other
countries
. In my opinion, it is more
important
for
people
to take in the breadth of
culture
of the whole
world
rather
than
just
their
country
.
If
children
start
from a young age learning about the
world
they are likely to grow up more tolerant.