Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many species of plants and animals have come and gone through the history of the earth. From this perspective extinction can be seen as part of a natural process. Some people have argued we should not, there for make heroic efforts to preserve the natural habitats of endangered plants and animals. When doing so conflicts with human interact. To what extent do you agree with this view.t

Many species of plants and animals have come and gone through the history of the earth. From this perspective extinction can be seen as part of a natural process. Some people have argued we should not, there for make heroic efforts to preserve the natural habitats of endangered plants and animals. When doing so conflicts with human interact. t bLPl
Throughout the ages several kinds of flora and fauna have apeared and disapeared on the planet surface. Seenig from this point of view vanishing of entire species can be consider as the law of nature. some might say it is not mandatory to taking vigorous actions to protect the wherebouts of this thretened living organisms, nonetheless it may overshadow with livelihood of mankind. In the struggle of land and food I think this notion hold a valid ground. All living things which on the earth, are attributed to the eco world, although the human race is much more superior than other animals and plants, it is the one who need whast space of land to live and die. In any infrastructure development project for the future of the humankind there must be an unavoidable termination to the nature, therefore humans pay less attention to enviromental protection because there mind always focus on the big picture of making space for growing human population. For instance wild elephant population get diminish through years due to human-elephant conflict, because expansion of human settlements to the wildlife conservation areas. The only action taken by govenment ofiicials to protect elephants is relocating them from there natural habitts to lands which are alian to themselves that may lead to their lower reproduction rates. Humans tend to grow their own food other than get feed from the nature similar to animals, however the growing demand for food make more concern to them about crop and livestock security from animals. In case of growing and protecting food, people use many detrimental measures to animals and plants such as defroestration to make space for farmlands, blocking the migration routes of animals by fences with electricity, overuse of pesticides which also harm to insects helped to pollination, and even further some times killing of animals. For example some areas government not only allow farmers to use air rifels against monkies procupines and birds but also given permission to them for hunt the wild boers, considering it is useless to protect these animals other then giving priority to hunger of the humans. Many people have a vision about preserving the nature for the future generations because they think humans also the part of this ecological system. Eventhough many species dying out through centuries their opinion is, it is ought to protect the remaining lives for balance the nature, otherwise according to their view, considering the natural history if one specie have the domination of the planet, it will also has the authority to protect the rest in whatever circumstance. In conclusion, considering land and food human race always need the proiority rather than other species. considering the eradication of several flora and fauna throughout the history. It is the procedure of the nature to clear the path for certain type of species to rule the world so extra measures to protect the other kind of lives are not necessary for the future.
Throughout the ages several kinds of flora and fauna have
Possible spelling mistake found.
apeared
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
disapeared
on the planet surface.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Seenig
from this point of view vanishing of entire species can be
Consider using the past participle "considered"?
consider
as the law of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
some
might say it is not mandatory to
Did you mean "take"?
taking
vigorous actions to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protect
the
Possible spelling mistake found.
wherebouts
of this
Possible spelling mistake found.
thretened
living organisms, nonetheless it may overshadow with livelihood of mankind. In the struggle of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
this notion hold a valid ground.

All living things which on the earth,
are attributed
to the
Possible spelling mistake found.
eco
world, although the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
race is much
The adjective 'more' is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: "superior to".
more superior than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and plants, it is the one who need
Possible spelling mistake found.
whast
space of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
. In any infrastructure development project for the future of the humankind there
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be an unavoidable termination to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
,
therefore
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
pay less attention to
Possible spelling mistake found.
enviromental
protection
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
there mind always focus on the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
picture of making space for growing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
population.
For instance
wild elephant population
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
diminish through years due to human-elephant conflict,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
expansion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
settlements to the wildlife conservation areas. The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
action taken by
Possible spelling mistake found.
govenment
Possible spelling mistake found.
ofiicials
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protect
elephants is relocating them from there natural
Possible spelling mistake found.
habitts
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lands
which are
Possible spelling mistake found.
alian
to themselves that may lead to their lower reproduction rates.

Humans tend to grow their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
than
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
feed from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
similar to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
,
however
the growing demand for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
more concern to them about crop and livestock security from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. In case of growing and protecting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
detrimental measures to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and plants such as
Possible spelling mistake found.
defroestration
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
space for farmlands, blocking the migration routes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
by fences with electricity, overuse of pesticides which
also
harm to insects
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helped
to pollination, and even
further
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
times killing of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
For example
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "areas'" or "area's"?
areas
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
farmers to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
air
Possible spelling mistake found.
rifels
against
Possible spelling mistake found.
monkies
Possible spelling mistake found.
procupines
and birds
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
permission to them for hunt the wild
Possible spelling mistake found.
boers
, considering it is useless to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protect
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
Did you mean "other than"?
other then
giving priority to hunger of the humans.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
have a vision about preserving the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
for the future generations
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
also
the part of this ecological system.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Eventhough
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
species dying out through centuries their opinion is, it is ought to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protect
the remaining
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
for balance the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
,
otherwise
according to their view, considering the natural history if one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
specie
have the domination of the planet, it will
also
The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: "have"
has
the authority to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protect
the rest in whatever circumstance.

In conclusion
, considering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
race always need the
Possible spelling mistake found.
proiority
rather
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
species.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
considering
the eradication of
Possible agreement error. The noun flora seems to be countable; consider using: "several florae", "several floras".
several flora
and fauna throughout the history. It is the procedure of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
the path for certain type of species to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rule
the world
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
extra measures to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
protect
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
kind of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
are not necessary for the future.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many species of plants and animals have come and gone through the history of the earth. From this perspective extinction can be seen as part of a natural process. Some people have argued we should not, there for make heroic efforts to preserve the natural habitats of endangered plants and animals. When doing so conflicts with human interact. t

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
491 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts