Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many schools today require students to work without pay for companies as part of their education. Is this more advantageous to students or companies?

Many schools today require students to work without pay for companies as part of their education. Is this more advantageous to students or companies? RNk7W
An increasing number of schools are forcing students to do unpaid internships with companies as a graduation requirement. In my opinion, this measure generally benefits students more than companies. On the one hand, companies receive free labor. Every company, whether it is an international conglomerate or a small local business, must balance expenses against revenue in hopes of turning a profit. One of the largest operating expenses is labor and having unpaid volunteers from a nearby school helps companies carve out a larger profit margin. For example, a local supermarket could use high school students to help with bagging groceries, collecting carts, stocking shelves and potentially even manning the cash registers. The savings from this labor can make a sizable difference for companies as long as they have simple, manual positions that require little training and schools are willing to offer up students for these monotonous jobs. On the other hand, students will generally not want to do simple, manual labor but work in a more interesting field, where they might be more of a hindrance than a help. A hypothetical example of this would be a student who has a keen interest in a given field, such as film-making, landing an internship with a local television station. In this high-pressured, skilled environment, an experienced employee will have to be charged with training and supervising a student who is unlikely to remain long with the company. This unpaid trainee will probably struggle to make much of a positive difference since the learning curve on skilled work is steep and the consequences for making mistakes can be serious. The student will learn a lot of useful skills but the company should see this as a form of charity, rather than a boon for their bottom line. In conclusion, compulsory unpaid work for companies usually benefits students as they have a lot to learn and companies must invest in training. These positions are chances for students to become acclimated to the working world and not simply free manual labour.
An increasing number of
schools
are forcing
students
to do unpaid internships with
companies
as a graduation requirement. In my opinion, this measure
generally
benefits
students
more than
companies
.

On the one hand,
companies
receive free
labor
. Every
company
, whether it is an international conglomerate or a
small
local business,
must
balance expenses against revenue in hopes of turning a profit. One of the largest operating expenses is
labor
and having unpaid volunteers from a nearby
school
helps
companies
carve out a larger profit margin.
For example
, a local supermarket could
use
high
school
students
to
help
with bagging groceries, collecting carts, stocking shelves and
potentially
even manning the cash registers. The savings from this
labor
can
make
a sizable difference for
companies
as long as they have simple, manual positions that require
little
training and
schools
are willing to offer up
students
for these monotonous jobs.

On the other hand
,
students
will
generally
not want to do simple, manual
labor
but
work in a more interesting field, where they might be more of a hindrance than a
help
. A hypothetical example of this would be a
student
who has a keen interest in a
given
field, such as film-making, landing an internship with a local television station. In this high-pressured, skilled environment, an experienced employee will
have to
be charged
with training and supervising a
student
who is unlikely to remain long with the
company
. This unpaid trainee will
probably
struggle to
make
much of a
positive
difference since the learning curve on skilled work is steep and the consequences for making mistakes can be serious. The
student
will learn
a lot of
useful
skills
but
the
company
should
see
this as a form of charity,
rather
than a boon for their bottom line.

In conclusion
, compulsory unpaid work for
companies
usually
benefits
students
as they have a lot to learn and
companies
must
invest in training. These positions are chances for
students
to become acclimated to the working world and not
simply
free manual
labour
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many schools today require students to work without pay for companies as part of their education. Is this more advantageous to students or companies?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
337 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts