It is the desire of the people that streets in their premises should be clean and tidy. While some think individuals have the primary responsibility for making this happen, others think it is the obligation of the state. Both views are significant, and hence a detailed discussion is needed before framing a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, those who think it is the government’s responsibility feel that only a systematic approach can make this happen. They think that there should be a well-established legal system, which should be kept before the citizens, and this can ensure the cleanliness of their surroundings. Most governments levy taxes from the public, either directly and indirectly, and naturally, it becomes their responsibility to maintain streets clean and tidy, they add. Finally, they think that the cleaning process involves some sorts of investment, staff and machineries, and individuals can hardly afford such expenses. On the other hand, those who think the other way believe that the way which the streets proximal to a residential community reflects their identity. It is to be understood that clean and tidy surroundings are indeed the pride of the residents. Secondly, they highlight the social responsibility of maintaining these places tidy. In order to have a healthy and safe environment, an individual should not only maintain his home clean, but also his surroundings. Lastly, only when the primary initiative is taken by the individual residents, ranging from proper segregation and disposal of wastes to growing trees for shades, governments can accomplish the goal in a perfect manner.
After analysing both these views in detail, even though it appears that both governments and residents have equal responsibility in making the streets clean and tidy, I think the role of the latter is more significant.
It is the desire of the
people
that
streets
in their premises should be
clean
and
tidy
. While
some
think
individuals
have the primary
responsibility
for making this happen, others
think
it is the obligation of the state. Both views are significant, and
hence
a detailed discussion
is needed
before
framing a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, those who
think
it is the
government’s
responsibility
feel that
only
a systematic approach can
make
this happen. They
think
that there should be a well-established legal system, which should be
kept
before
the citizens, and this can ensure the cleanliness of their surroundings. Most
governments
levy taxes from the public, either
directly
and
indirectly
, and
naturally
, it becomes their
responsibility
to maintain
streets
clean
and
tidy
, they
add
.
Finally
, they
think
that the cleaning process involves
some
sorts of investment, staff and
machineries
, and
individuals
can hardly afford such expenses.
On the other hand
, those who
think
the other way believe that the way which the
streets
proximal to a residential community reflects their identity. It is to
be understood
that
clean
and
tidy
surroundings are
indeed
the pride of the residents.
Secondly
, they highlight the social
responsibility
of maintaining these places
tidy
. In order to have a healthy and safe environment, an
individual
should not
only
maintain his home
clean
,
but
also
his surroundings.
Lastly
,
only
when the primary initiative
is taken
by the
individual
residents, ranging from proper segregation and disposal of wastes to growing trees for shades,
governments
can accomplish the goal
in a perfect manner
.
After
analysing
both these views in detail,
even though
it appears that both
governments
and residents have equal
responsibility
in making the
streets
clean
and
tidy
, I
think
the role of the latter is more significant.