Customs regarding the raising of children vary from on culture to another. In many
countries, children are cared for by daytime guardians while their parents work to
build careers. It is argued that this form of rearing does not benefit children as much
as when they are raised directly by their biological parents. This will be proven by
looking at how such a family arrangement causes misguided values and feelings of
abandonment among the young people in question.
Firstly, parents who choose their professional goals over raising their children run the
risk of setting poor examples for their offspring. For instance, children of double income families are often indirectly taught that money is more important than family unity. These children grow up with unhealthy opinions about the significance of income level and could potentially become adults who judge other human beings based on monetary status. As this reasoning shows, children are best raised by their
parents.
Secondly, young children regularly separated from their parents may experience
feelings of abandonment and this can lead to other problems. For example, it is a
proven fact that Canadian children of single, working parents tend not to perform as
well in school as their classmates from nuclear familial arrangements boasting a stay at-home mother or father. This example shows that there is a clear link between a child’s academic performance and the level of attention they receive from their parents. Thus, it is clear that young people are not benefited when they are raised by guardians.
After analyzing the above points, the merits of regular parental presence can be
seen. It has thus been proven that parents should avoid working patterns that are
detrimental to the development of their children. It is hoped parents everywhere
commit to do what they can to ensure they are the primary guidance-providers of
their young ones
Customs regarding the raising of
children
vary from on culture to another. In
many
countries,
children
are cared
for by daytime guardians while their
parents
work to
build
careers. It
is argued
that this form of rearing does not benefit
children
as
much
as
when they
are raised
directly
by their biological
parents
. This will
be proven
by
looking at how such a family arrangement causes misguided values and feelings of
abandonment
among the
young
people
in question.
Firstly
,
parents
who choose their professional goals over raising their
children
run the
risk
of setting poor examples for their offspring.
For instance
,
children
of double income families are
often
indirectly
taught that money is more
important
than family unity. These
children
grow up with unhealthy opinions about the significance of income level and could
potentially
become adults who judge other human beings based on monetary status. As this reasoning
shows
,
children
are best raised by
their
parents
.
Secondly
,
young
children
regularly
separated from their
parents
may experience
feelings
of abandonment and this can lead to other problems.
For example
, it is
a
proven fact that Canadian
children
of single, working
parents
tend not to perform as
well
in school as their classmates from nuclear familial arrangements boasting a stay at-home mother or father. This example
shows
that there is a
clear
link between a child’s academic performance and the level of attention they receive from their
parents
.
Thus
, it is
clear
that
young
people
are not benefited when they
are raised
by guardians.
After analyzing the above points, the merits of regular parental presence can be
seen
. It has
thus
been proven
that
parents
should avoid working patterns that
are
detrimental
to the development of their
children
. It
is hoped
parents
everywhere
commit to do what they can to ensure they are the primary guidance-providers of
their
young
ones