With the acceleration of population growth, high-rise buildings are constantly mushrooming as opposed to the lack of public spaces in big cities. However, there is a school of thought that municipal governments should invest substantially in erecting vast outdoor public spaces, and I am in total agreement on this question for three main reasons.
To begin with, large public spaces could help improve the quality of the environment. Because such places are generally filled with a large number of trees, which regulate air temperature and absorb atmospheric pollutants. According to a study conducted in Viet Nam, for every 10% increase in the number of parks and gardens, the level of air pollution will decrease by 20%. In this way, the contamination degree of air, water would be ameliorated.
In addition, it is undeniable that public spaces are highly beneficial to the well-being of communities. There are many parks, gardens and squares that offer an abundance of freely accessible facilities which promote a positive change to people’s sedentary lifestyle. Public spaces in Hanoi, for example, typically provide city dwellers with free exercise equipments and fitness activities. As a result, residents in the vicinity of these places tend to exercise more regularly.
Furthermore, ample public spaces might generate revenue and stimulate local economies. It is because constructing attractive outdoor public spaces would enhance the beauty of the city which is likely to draw attention from various tourists. Times Square in New York City, for example, attracts millions of visitors a year, and it is considered one of the major economic drivers for the city. Consequently, the shortage of city budget is highly likely to be solved.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that enormous public spaces bring considerable benefits to local communities. The authorities should be cognizant of these advantages and invest heavily in constructing outdoor public places.
With the acceleration of population growth, high-rise buildings are
constantly
mushrooming as opposed to the lack of
public
spaces
in
big
cities
.
However
, there is a school of
thought
that municipal
governments
should invest
substantially
in erecting vast outdoor
public
spaces
, and I am in total agreement on this question for three main reasons.
To
begin
with, large
public
spaces
could
help
improve
the quality of the environment.
Because
such places are
generally
filled with
a large number of
trees, which regulate air temperature and absorb atmospheric pollutants. According to a study conducted in
Viet
Nam, for every 10% increase in the number of parks and gardens, the level of air pollution will decrease by 20%. In this way, the contamination degree of air, water would
be ameliorated
.
In addition
, it is undeniable that
public
spaces
are
highly
beneficial to the well-being of communities. There are
many
parks, gardens and squares that offer an abundance of
freely
accessible facilities which promote a
positive
change
to
people
’s sedentary lifestyle.
Public
spaces
in Hanoi,
for example
,
typically
provide city dwellers with free exercise equipments and fitness activities.
As a result
, residents in the vicinity of these places tend to exercise more
regularly
.
Furthermore
, ample
public
spaces
might generate revenue and stimulate local economies. It is
because
constructing attractive outdoor
public
spaces
would enhance the beauty of the city which is likely to draw attention from various tourists. Times Square in New York City,
for example
, attracts millions of visitors a year, and it
is considered
one of the major economic drivers for the city.
Consequently
, the shortage of city budget is
highly
likely to
be solved
.
In conclusion
, I am of the opinion that enormous
public
spaces
bring considerable benefits to local communities. The authorities should be cognizant of these advantages and invest
heavily
in constructing outdoor
public
places.