It is believed by a number of people that in metropolitan cities, public transportation must be provided without any charges. However, despite the positive aspects of this amenity there are some drawbacks. Both of the rides will be discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.
On the one hand, free travel in public vehicles can certainly bring benefits for the people especially in financial terms. For individuals, as a monetary assistance by authorities as the daily commute fare will be saved. Additionally, on a boarder scale, a considerable impact of this phenomenon is on environment. To illustrate this approach, because public transport will be free, people will give priority to it rather than using their own conveyances. Ultimately, this trend will assist in tiding over population problems as automobiles are a major source of air pollution due to the emission of hazardous fumes into the atmosphere. Eventually, a decrease in traffic congestion will automatically occur due to diminished use of private vehicles. Hence, there are immense advantages of free public transportation.
However, on the other hand, it is also possible that free travel in public vehicles can put detrimental effects on the smooth functioning of governmental policies. For instance, in a recent publication, it stated that in developed countries, income from public transportation accounts for 6: 1 to 12: 1 of the GDP. Therefore, it is obvious that this considerable proportion of revenue will not be available and further expenditures such as maintenance, investment and salaries will put an additional financial burden on authorities which could have been used in alternative needy sectors. So, it cannot be considered as a wise decision to make public transportation free of charge.
In conclusion, even though many people suggest to make urban transportation to facilitate the journeys for city dwellers, it will not help the bodies economically which is the major drawback against several benefits of this suggestion.
It
is believed
by a number of
people
that in metropolitan cities,
public
transportation
must
be provided
without any charges.
However
, despite the
positive
aspects of this amenity there are
some
drawbacks. Both of the rides will
be discussed
in the forthcoming paragraphs.
On the one hand,
free
travel in
public
vehicles can
certainly
bring benefits for the
people
especially
in financial terms. For individuals, as a monetary assistance by authorities as the daily commute fare will
be saved
.
Additionally
, on a boarder scale, a considerable impact of this phenomenon is on environment. To illustrate this approach,
because
public
transport will be
free
,
people
will give priority to it
rather
than using their
own
conveyances.
Ultimately
, this trend will assist in tiding over population problems as automobiles are a major source of air pollution due to the emission of hazardous fumes into the atmosphere.
Eventually
, a decrease in traffic congestion will
automatically
occur due to diminished
use
of private vehicles.
Hence
, there are immense advantages of
free
public
transportation.
However
,
on the other hand
, it is
also
possible that
free
travel in
public
vehicles can put detrimental effects on the smooth functioning of governmental policies.
For instance
, in a recent publication, it stated that in
developed countries
, income from
public
transportation
accounts for 6: 1 to 12: 1 of the GDP.
Therefore
, it is obvious that this considerable proportion of revenue will not be available and
further
expenditures such as maintenance, investment and salaries will put an additional financial burden on authorities which could have been
used
in alternative needy sectors.
So
, it cannot
be considered
as a wise decision to
make
public
transportation
free
of charge.
In conclusion
,
even though
many
people
suggest to
make
urban
transportation
to facilitate the journeys for city dwellers, it will not
help
the bodies
economically
which is the major drawback against several benefits of this suggestion.