In this set of material, the article strongly postulates that Mars could ber possible next planet to live as resources on earths are in dearth, and provide three characteristics to endorse its idea. However, the lecture mentions that reading arguments are dubious and unconvincing, and gainsays each of them
To begin with, the writer asserts that there is probability of liquid water presence on the Mars as suggested by scertain elements found by radar mission on the surface of the Mars. This was confirmed after observing the electromagnetic rays returned from the poles of Mars. On the other hand, the speaker posits this claim by insisting that liquid water can not be possible under the poles of mars. As the temperature of the mars was extremely cold about-7 degree unlike swarmer earth's surface. Therfore, in that freezing temperature water cannot exist in liquid form. Moreover mars is not geologically active, so maintainence of liquid state is not possible and elements could be different than water.
Furthermore, the lecturer contradicts by insisting that mars atmoshere is too harsh for humans to live. Though microbes can be grown in that extreme weather conditions, human body is weker and can not tolerate the harshness of weather. On top, the weather variability could either freeze the human body or burnt it because mars surface is 100 times denser than earth too. Thses claims clearly refutes the writer's implication that human living oin earthg can endure the mars environment and proved that by growth of micro organisms on mars surface.
Ultimately, the writer wraps up its arguments by declaring that methane gas was found on mars and that gas is of paramount importance for human survival on mars. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes an issue with that by declaring that there was no methan sign on mars. Or if mathene is present it was in extremely limited amount that it could not be conseidered for survival. In addition, an upgraded instrument wurs had confirmed that presence of methane is not observed.
In this set of material, the article
strongly
postulates that
Mars
could
ber
possible
next
planet to
live
as resources on earths are in dearth, and provide three characteristics to endorse its
idea
.
However
, the lecture mentions that reading arguments are dubious and unconvincing, and gainsays each of them
To
begin
with, the writer asserts that there is probability of liquid water presence on the
Mars
as suggested by
scertain
elements found by radar mission on the surface of the
Mars
. This
was confirmed
after observing the electromagnetic rays returned from the poles of
Mars
.
On the other hand
, the speaker posits this claim by insisting that liquid water can not be possible under the poles of
mars
.
As
the temperature of the
mars
was
extremely
cold
about-7 degree unlike
swarmer
earth's surface.
Therfore
, in that freezing temperature water cannot exist in liquid form.
Moreover
mars
is not
geologically
active,
so
maintainence
of liquid state is not possible and elements could be
different
than
water.
Furthermore
, the lecturer contradicts by insisting that
mars
atmoshere
is too harsh for
humans
to
live
. Though microbes can
be grown
in that extreme weather conditions,
human
body is
weker
and can not tolerate the harshness of weather. On top, the weather variability could either freeze the
human
body or burnt it
because
mars
surface is 100 times denser than earth too.
Thses
claims
clearly
refutes the writer's implication that
human
living
oin
earthg
can endure the
mars
environment and proved that by growth of
micro organisms
on
mars
surface.
Ultimately
, the writer wraps up its arguments by declaring that methane gas
was found
on
mars
and that gas is of paramount importance for
human
survival on
mars
. Not
surprisingly
, the lecturer takes an issue with that by declaring that there was no
methan
sign
on
mars
. Or if
mathene
is present it was in
extremely
limited amount that it could not be
conseidered
for survival.
In addition
, an upgraded instrument
wurs
had confirmed that presence of methane is not observed.