Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field; however, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of human instructors in the education settings. First, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one. Specifically, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and human thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator, however, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience. Indeed, human lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they are absorbed in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can fully supply students with social skills, soft skills employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount

It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field; however, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of human instructors in the education settings. First, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one. Specifically, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and human thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator, however, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience. Indeed, human lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they are absorbed in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can fully supply students with social skills, soft skills employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount obReD
It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field; however, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of human instructors in the education settings. First, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one. Specifically, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and human thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator, however, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience. Indeed, human lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they are absorbed in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can fully supply students with social skills, soft skills employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount of data accurately in a short time, offer scholars faster results than conventional analysis, thus enhancing learning efficiency. Nevertheless, humans triumph over computers in numerous real-world tasks, including letting alone conceptualization and creativity. To sum up, it is understandable why computers appear unlikely to offer a total alternative to humans. I deduce that computers should be only an assistant to human instructors in education.
It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field;
however
, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of
human
instructors in the education settings.
First
, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one.
Specifically
, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and
human
thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator,
however
, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience.
Indeed
,
human
lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they
are absorbed
in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can
fully
supply students with social
skills
, soft
skills
employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount of data
accurately
in a short time, offer scholars faster results than conventional analysis,
thus
enhancing learning efficiency.
Nevertheless
,
humans
triumph over computers in numerous real-world tasks, including letting alone conceptualization and creativity. To sum up, it is understandable why computers appear unlikely to offer a total alternative to
humans
. I deduce that computers should be
only
an assistant to
human
instructors in education.

IELTS essay It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field; however, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of human instructors in the education settings. First, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one. Specifically, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and human thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator, however, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience. Indeed, human lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they are absorbed in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can fully supply students with social skills, soft skills employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
212 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
4.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: