It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field; however, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of human instructors in the education settings. First, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one. Specifically, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and human thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator, however, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience. Indeed, human lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they are absorbed in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can fully supply students with social skills, soft skills employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount
It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field; however, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of human instructors in the education settings. First, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one. Specifically, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and human thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator, however, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience. Indeed, human lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they are absorbed in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can fully supply students with social skills, soft skills employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount obReD
It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field; however, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of human instructors in the education settings. First, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one. Specifically, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and human thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator, however, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience. Indeed, human lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they are absorbed in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can fully supply students with social skills, soft skills employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount of data accurately in a short time, offer scholars faster results than conventional analysis, thus enhancing learning efficiency. Nevertheless, humans triumph over computers in numerous real-world tasks, including letting alone conceptualization and creativity. To sum up, it is understandable why computers appear unlikely to offer a total alternative to humans. I deduce that computers should be only an assistant to human instructors in education.
It is undeniable that computers have occupied a fundamental role in the academic field;
however
, I believe that students cannot contrive their tasks without the attendance of
human
instructors in the education settings.
First
, a lecturer powered by AI would perform less interaction with his students than a real one.
Specifically
, the learning process has required eye contact of a teacher to express emotions and
human
thinking, which can promote interpersonal classroom interaction. A robotic educator,
however
, is unable to provide such crucial contacts. Second, conventional teachers prevail over programmed ones in practical experience.
Indeed
,
human
lecturers can sustain learners with know-how, advice as they
are absorbed
in agitation or despair. Unlike computers, beyond theory in books, real educators can
fully
supply students with social
skills
, soft
skills
employed in their future career path. Opponents of my thesis might claim that computing innovations could process a vast amount of data
accurately
in a short time, offer scholars faster results than conventional analysis,
thus
enhancing learning efficiency.
Nevertheless
,
humans
triumph over computers in numerous real-world tasks, including letting alone conceptualization and creativity. To sum up, it is understandable why computers appear unlikely to offer a total alternative to
humans
. I deduce that computers should be
only
an assistant to
human
instructors in education.