Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

It is true that medical inventions are commonly tested on animals to ensure safety before being launched on the market for the public. While some argue that these animal tests should be prohibited in terms of ethical perspective given the pain and suffering caused to/ INFLICTED ON animals, some believe that these experiments are indispensable for the discoveries of medicine.

It is true that medical inventions are commonly tested on animals to ensure safety before being launched on the market for the public. While some argue that these animal tests should be prohibited in terms of ethical perspective given the pain and suffering caused to/ INFLICTED ON animals, some believe that these experiments are indispensable for the discoveries of medicine. B7ayj
It is true that medical inventions are commonly tested on animals to ensure safety before being launched on the market for the public. While some argue that these animal tests should be prohibited in terms of ethical perspective given the pain and suffering caused to/ INFLICTED ON animals, some believe that these experiments are indispensable for the discoveries of medicine. This essay discusses both sides and then I will give my own perspective. On the one hand, some claim that medical testing on animal bodies should be banned for moral reasons because of the pain and fear that laboratory animals may suffer. The main justification for believing this is that animal experimentation is showing the cruel and selfish behavior of the human race to animals. Admittedly, the procedures of assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products may cause → may be the culprit behind a lot of pain and distress to living creatures, which is the reason why the tremendous benefits to human safety cannot justify the suffering caused. An unethical example could be the behavioral tests measuring anxiety in rats that force a large number of rats and mice to suffer from electric shock and inhale toxic fumes. Moreover, animal experimentation is unethical and may not be the best way among measures for drugs testing because scientists can apply some alternatives considered as non-animal methods. Specifically, some alternatives to replace animal testing have been reported to obtain a desirable result, including experimenting on cell structures or using computer models are among some that can epitomize this argument. On the other hand, proponents of animal experiments may state that it is necessary to use animals to test drugs before the medicinal products can be sold on the market. Firstly, this approach may save people from the risk of unwanted side effects of medicines such as some permanent injuries on mental health, and even death. To be more specific, the human race is facing the threat of idiopathic diseases like covid-19, and thus medicinal research implemented by specialists is essential/ plays a pivotal role in to understand human diseases and to develop new treatments. Secondly, some studies on the effects of genetic diseases could enable researchers to explore treatments for serious diseases consisting of cancer, heart disease, stroke, and other chronic diseases. This practice is expected to not only make scientific advances but also contribute to life-saving purposes. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, I feel that the use of animals in medical research should be prohibited from a moral point of view/ perspective In other words, some non-animal alternative methods should be taken into consideration.
It is true that medical inventions are
commonly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to ensure safety
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
being launched
on the market for the public. While
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
argue that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
should
be prohibited
in terms of ethical perspective
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
the pain and suffering caused to/ INFLICTED ON
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
believe that these experiments are indispensable for the discoveries of medicine. This essay discusses both sides and then I will give my
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
perspective.

On the one hand,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
claim that medical testing on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
bodies should
be banned
for moral reasons
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the pain and fear that laboratory
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
may suffer. The main justification for believing this is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experimentation is showing the cruel and selfish behavior of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
race to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
Admittedly
, the procedures of assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products may cause → may be the culprit behind
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
pain and distress to living creatures, which is the reason why the tremendous benefits to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
safety cannot justify the suffering caused. An unethical example could be the behavioral
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
measuring anxiety in rats that force
Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use "many" or "numerous"
a large number of
rats and mice to suffer from electric shock and inhale toxic fumes.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experimentation is unethical and may not be the best way among measures for drugs testing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
scientists can apply
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
alternatives considered as non-animal methods.
Specifically
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
alternatives to replace
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testing have
been reported
to obtain a desirable result, including experimenting on cell structures or using computer models are among
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
that can epitomize this argument.

On the other hand
, proponents of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experiments may state that it is necessary to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
drugs
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
the medicinal products can
be sold
on the market.
Firstly
, this approach may save
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
from the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
of unwanted side effects of medicines such as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
permanent injuries on mental health, and even death. To be more specific, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
race is facing the threat of idiopathic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diseases
like
Did you mean "COVID-19" or the alternative spelling "Covid-19" (= coronavirus)?
covid-19
, and
thus
medicinal research implemented by specialists is essential/ plays a pivotal role in to understand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diseases
and to develop new treatments.
Secondly
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
studies on the effects of genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diseases
could enable researchers to explore treatments for serious
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diseases
consisting of cancer, heart
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
disease
, stroke, and other chronic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diseases
. This practice is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
scientific advances
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
contribute to life-saving purposes.

In conclusion
, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, I feel that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in medical research should
be prohibited
from a moral point of view/ perspective
In other words
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
non-animal alternative methods should
be taken
into consideration.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay It is true that medical inventions are commonly tested on animals to ensure safety before being launched on the market for the public. While some argue that these animal tests should be prohibited in terms of ethical perspective given the pain and suffering caused to/ INFLICTED ON animals, some believe that these experiments are indispensable for the discoveries of medicine.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
440 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts