Society has been divided on the basis of financial success. While some people give significance to social position, others believe values like empathy, respect and beloningness as essential. I strongly prefer values over money. In the forthcominh paragraphs, I will give reasons to support the aforementioned opinion.
To commence with, a persons' worthCannot be judged by the social staus. Although an individual may be financially on a higher rank, they lack social responsibility ti help poor. Moreover, material possessions are only for their personal conveinence. It is more important that these people use their previlages to help the downtrodden. In a survey conducted by ' The Delhi University' about 30% of rich people are only helping the poor. Therefore, giving them higher status is worthless.
On the other hand, if a oerson has emotions such as honour, kidness and trust, then they are respected for ages. Nevertheless, these people even if they are not financially doing great stikk have mindset to help the needy with whatever littke they have. Furthermore, a sense of giving ought to be valued rather than economicak success. In a newspaper article published on the topic of psycological research staes that crime rate is less among people whi have higher emotional quotient
In conclusion, a person can be successful by his or her position and possession but it is unfair to give importance on this basis. Infact they should be valued for their other personal traits for instance positivity, compatibility and so on. 
Society has  
been divided
 on the basis of financial success. While  
some
  people
 give significance to social position, others believe values like empathy, respect and  
beloningness
 as essential. I  
strongly
  prefer values over money
. In the  
forthcominh
 paragraphs, I will give reasons to support the aforementioned opinion.
To commence with, a persons'  
worthCannot
  be judged
 by the social  
staus
. Although an individual may be  
financially
 on a higher rank, they lack social responsibility ti  
help
 poor.  
Moreover
, material possessions are  
only
 for their personal  
conveinence
. It is more  
important
 that these  
people
  use
 their  
previlages
 to  
help
 the downtrodden. In a survey conducted by  
' 
The Delhi University' about 30% of rich  
people
 are  
only
 helping the poor.  
Therefore
, giving them higher status is worthless. 
On the other hand
, if  
a
  oerson
 has emotions such as  
honour
,  
kidness
 and trust, then they  
are respected
 for ages.  
Nevertheless
, these  
people
 even if they are not  
financially
 doing great  
stikk
 have mindset to  
help
 the needy with whatever  
littke
 they have.  
Furthermore
, a sense of giving ought to  
be valued
  rather
 than  
economicak
 success. In a newspaper article published on the topic of  
psycological
 research  
staes
 that crime rate is less among  
people
  whi
 have higher emotional quotient 
In conclusion
, a person can be successful by  
his or her
 position and possession  
but
 it is unfair to give importance on this basis.  
Infact
 they should  
be valued
 for their other personal traits  
for instance
 positivity, compatibility and  
so
 on.