Society has been divided on the basis of financial success. While some people give significance to social position, others believe values like empathy, respect and beloningness as essential. I strongly prefer values over money. In the forthcominh paragraphs, I will give reasons to support the aforementioned opinion.
To commence with, a persons' worthCannot be judged by the social staus. Although an individual may be financially on a higher rank, they lack social responsibility ti help poor. Moreover, material possessions are only for their personal conveinence. It is more important that these people use their previlages to help the downtrodden. In a survey conducted by ' The Delhi University' about 30% of rich people are only helping the poor. Therefore, giving them higher status is worthless.
On the other hand, if a oerson has emotions such as honour, kidness and trust, then they are respected for ages. Nevertheless, these people even if they are not financially doing great stikk have mindset to help the needy with whatever littke they have. Furthermore, a sense of giving ought to be valued rather than economicak success. In a newspaper article published on the topic of psycological research staes that crime rate is less among people whi have higher emotional quotient
In conclusion, a person can be successful by his or her position and possession but it is unfair to give importance on this basis. Infact they should be valued for their other personal traits for instance positivity, compatibility and so on.
Society has
been divided
on the basis of financial success. While
some
people
give significance to social position, others believe values like empathy, respect and
beloningness
as essential. I
strongly
prefer values over money
. In the
forthcominh
paragraphs, I will give reasons to support the aforementioned opinion.
To commence with, a persons'
worthCannot
be judged
by the social
staus
. Although an individual may be
financially
on a higher rank, they lack social responsibility ti
help
poor.
Moreover
, material possessions are
only
for their personal
conveinence
. It is more
important
that these
people
use
their
previlages
to
help
the downtrodden. In a survey conducted by
'
The Delhi University' about 30% of rich
people
are
only
helping the poor.
Therefore
, giving them higher status is worthless.
On the other hand
, if
a
oerson
has emotions such as
honour
,
kidness
and trust, then they
are respected
for ages.
Nevertheless
, these
people
even if they are not
financially
doing great
stikk
have mindset to
help
the needy with whatever
littke
they have.
Furthermore
, a sense of giving ought to
be valued
rather
than
economicak
success. In a newspaper article published on the topic of
psycological
research
staes
that crime rate is less among
people
whi
have higher emotional quotient
In conclusion
, a person can be successful by
his or her
position and possession
but
it is unfair to give importance on this basis.
Infact
they should
be valued
for their other personal traits
for instance
positivity, compatibility and
so
on.