Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. LgL3
The role of one government to support citizens of other countries has been a major topic of concern in today’s society. From my perspective, this practice is feasible, and there are compelling reasons why governments should help people in the global community rather than only focusing on the citizen of their own country. In the context of globalisation and international integration, the provision of assistance for peoples of all countries in the world is not an impossible task anymore. One explanation for this is that modern means of transport have transformed the way that international assistance could be given, and now assistance could reach even the most remote places on Earth. For example, thousands of victims of a deadly earthquake in a mountainous city in Nepal were rescued by US and German military helicopters in 2014. sing on the citizens of their own countries. One further explanation is that thanks to international banking, the international community could offer a helping hand to any country where the financial system is on the verge of collapse. An excellent example of this is that the saving money of millions of taxpayers and pensioners in Greece was saved by a timely act of the European Commission of injecting a huge amount of bailout money into Greek banks in 2009. I strongly believe any government must assume the responsibility of helping citizens in other countries. This is mainly because assisting inhabitants in other countries, to some extent, is synonymous to assisting people in the home country. In 2014, hundreds of US and UK doctors and nurses were sent to African countries to cope with the outbreak of Ebola, a dreadful plague, which had killed many thousands by that time. This action prevented the plague from further spreading to other nations, including the US and the UK themselves, considering that there was a free movement of people between countries and there were millions of African migrant workers in the US and the UK at that time. Besides, the act of supporting people all around the world may promote a sense of humanity, which is essential to the sustainable development of the world, because humanity is the foundation of peace and stability.
The role of one
government
to support
citizens
of
other
countries
has been a major topic of concern in
today
’s society. From my perspective, this practice is feasible, and there are compelling reasons why
governments
should
help
people
in the global community
rather
than
only
focusing on the
citizen
of their
own
country
. In the context of
globalisation
and
international
integration, the provision of assistance for
peoples
of all
countries
in the world is not an impossible task anymore. One explanation for this is that modern means of transport have transformed the way that
international
assistance could be
given
, and
now
assistance could reach even the most remote places on Earth.
For example
, thousands of victims of a deadly earthquake in a mountainous city in Nepal
were rescued
by US and German military helicopters in 2014.
sing
on the
citizens
of their
own
countries
. One
further
explanation is that thanks to
international
banking, the
international
community could offer a helping hand to any
country
where the financial system is on the verge of collapse. An excellent example of this is that the saving money of millions of taxpayers and pensioners in Greece
was saved
by a timely act of the European Commission of injecting a huge amount of bailout money into Greek banks in 2009.

I
strongly
believe any
government
must
assume the responsibility of helping
citizens
in
other
countries
. This is
mainly
because
assisting inhabitants in
other
countries
, to
some
extent, is synonymous to assisting
people
in the home
country
. In 2014, hundreds of US and UK doctors and nurses were
sent
to African
countries
to cope with the outbreak of Ebola, a dreadful plague, which had killed
many
thousands by that time. This action
prevented
the plague from
further
spreading to
other
nations, including the US and the UK themselves, considering that there was a free movement of
people
between
countries
and there were millions of African migrant workers in the US and the UK at that time.
Besides
, the act of supporting
people
all around the world may promote a sense of humanity, which is essential to the sustainable development of the world,
because
humanity is the foundation of peace and stability.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries.

Essay
  American English
2 paragraphs
365 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts