There is a public debate today that whether it is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. When it comes to this topic, some think that the leader has the power to control a group and a member has to obey the order. To be the leader is a common sense with most people, but is it a wise one? I think in some instances, to be a member is better for a person to contribute his power to a group.
As what we know in our daily life, to be a member of a group will have much less stress about general performance. It is not astonished that to be the leader of a group will work with more pressure and responsibility. Without having a good ability of resist to the pressure, it is harder to provide the assist to a group when you're the leader than a member of a group.
Furthermore, to be a member is easier to achieve efficiency through teamwork and improve oneself quickly by the cooperation with each team member. Just imagine that what it would be if you have a good experience with many team members who have excellent talents, that's no doubt you will learn a lot from your team members from a project.
Finally, team member is a indispensable part of a group who can find out the problems that maybe not apparent for the leader. To be a member of a group will often have a different angle to analysis issue from the leader, which may take more benifits for a group.
To the sum, it is true that “Every French soldier carries a marshal's baton in his knapsack“. However, the position of the leader is not suitable for everyone, in some situations, I believe that it is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group.
There is a public debate
today
that whether it is better to be a
member
of a
group
than to be the
leader
of a
group
. When it
comes
to this topic,
some
think
that the
leader
has the power to control a
group
and a
member
has to
obey the order. To be the
leader
is a common sense with most
people
,
but
is it a wise one? I
think
in
some
instances, to be a
member
is better for a person to contribute his power to a group.
As what we know in our daily life, to be a
member
of a
group
will have much less
stress
about general performance. It is not astonished that to be the
leader
of a
group
will work with more pressure and responsibility. Without having a
good
ability of resist to the pressure, it is harder to provide the assist to a
group
when you're the
leader
than a
member
of a group.
Furthermore
, to be a
member
is easier to achieve efficiency through teamwork and
improve
oneself
quickly
by the cooperation with each
team
member
.
Just
imagine that what it would be if you have a
good
experience with
many
team
members
who have excellent talents, that's no doubt you will learn a lot from your
team
members
from a project.
Finally
,
team
member
is
a
indispensable part of a
group
who can find out the problems that maybe not apparent for the
leader
. To be a
member
of a
group
will
often
have a
different
angle to analysis issue from the
leader
, which may take more
benifits
for a group.
To the sum, it is true that “Every French soldier carries a marshal's baton in his knapsack“.
However
, the position of the
leader
is not suitable for everyone, in
some
situations, I believe that it is better to be a
member
of a
group
than to be the
leader
of a
group
.