It is believe that oil and coal are diminishing at an alarming rate. What problem it can cause. What measures can be taken to solve  this problem. Discuss both. 
It is believe that oil and coal are diminishing at an alarming rate. What problem it can cause. What measures can be taken to solve this problem.  PLkGp
Oil, gas and coal are all non-renewable resources. This is known worldwide, as well as the fact that society lives above its demands. Even though fuel prices have increased significantly over the last decade, consumption will still cause these resources to run out eventually. It has been argued that the only way to decrease the usage of fuel is to further increase the prices.
Currently, most people think in the present and do not consider the future enough. Therefore, to affect people in their everyday lives, fuel prices ought to be raised. It is theorised that this will significantly decrease fossil fuel usage, as economic impact will be forced onto current users. It is necessary that fuel prices are high enough to immediately decrease the wealth of a family and make more people switch to public transport. Critics of this would argue, however, that society’s fossil fuels, such as petrol for cars, have an inelastic price and that price hikes would have no effect other than increasing tax and oil company revenues.
In addition, a significant increase in prices would not only impact each individual, but also a whole economy. Fuel prices are not only linked to transport, but also to food production, home heating and entertainment. A rise in prices in all these areas would seriously affect the standard of living of families with limited income and would mean the poorer parts of society would become even poorer.
In conclusion, while raising fuel prices is one of the most commonly-discussed solutions to fuel usage problems, this answer includes too many negative variables. Certainly, increasing fuel prices would create a small reduction of transport usage, but the far-reaching effects would be unfair and unsustainable
Oil, gas and coal are all non-renewable resources. This  
is known
 worldwide,  
as well
 as the fact that society  
lives
 above its demands.  
Even though
  fuel
  prices
 have increased  
significantly
 over the last decade, consumption will  
still
 cause these resources to run out  
eventually
. It has  
been argued
 that the  
only
 way to decrease the  
usage
 of  
fuel
 is to  
further
 increase the prices. 
Currently
, most  
people
  think
 in the present and do not consider the future  
enough
.  
Therefore
, to affect  
people
 in their everyday  
lives
,  
fuel
  prices
 ought to  
be raised
. It is  
theorised
 that this will  
significantly
 decrease fossil  
fuel
  usage
, as economic impact will  
be forced
 onto  
current
 users. It is necessary that  
fuel
  prices
 are high  
enough
 to immediately decrease the wealth of a family and  
make
 more  
people
 switch to public transport. Critics of this would argue,  
however
, that society’s fossil  
fuels
, such as petrol for cars, have an inelastic  
price
 and that  
price
 hikes would have no effect other than increasing tax and oil  
company
 revenues. 
In addition
, a significant increase in  
prices
 would not  
only
 impact each individual,  
but
  also
 a whole economy.  
Fuel
  prices
 are not  
only
 linked to transport,  
but
  also
 to food production, home heating and entertainment. A rise in  
prices
 in all these areas would  
seriously
 affect the standard of living of families with limited income and would mean the poorer parts of society would become even poorer. 
In conclusion
, while raising  
fuel
  prices
 is one of the most  
commonly
-discussed solutions to  
fuel
  usage
 problems, this answer includes too  
many
  negative
 variables.  
Certainly
, increasing  
fuel
  prices
 would create a  
small
 reduction of transport  
usage
,  
but
 the far-reaching effects would be unfair and unsustainable