Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

It is argued that more money is should spend on railways rather than roads by governments.

It is argued that more money is should spend on railways rather than roads by governments. m2XqA

It is argued that more money is should spend on railways rather than roads by governments. I completely agree with that improvements in railroads are crucial because probably they are not in a good situation in various cities. Roads are more qualified and comfortable already than railways in many countries; therefore, most people choose to travel by private car or buses in spite of the fact that they damage our planet. This type of travel is one of the main reasons of the climate change due to fact that they release exhaust fume. There are no need more roads; on the contrary, if we want to reduce the carbon emissions which caused by cars on roads, we should give more importance on railroads. Train and subway are the most environment-friendly types of transportation; however, many countries ignore this fact and do not give pay attention on it enough. Spending more money on railways can helps to improve the quality of trains and related services; thus, the populations who use it increase by the time. Furthermore, they might prefer to subways if they are in good condition. To illustrate, I pick the train while I am travelling because the new trains in my city are more comfortable and have more space for me rather than buses. Nevertheless, if governor did not change them, they would still old and their railway network did not enlarge to involve my route. In conclusion, my point of view, the governments should pay more attention on this issue and they should what they have to do. It is include that paying more money on railways.

It is argued
 that more money Did you mean "it"?it
is
 should spend on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
rather
 than roads by This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
. I completely This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with that improvements in railroads are crucial This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
probably
 they are not in a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 situation in various cities.

Roads are more qualified and comfortable already than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 countries; therefore
, most This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 choose to travel by private car or buses This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:notwithstanding
in spite of
 the fact that they damage our planet. This type of travel is one of the main reasons of the climate This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
 due to fact that they release exhaust fume. There are no need more roads; on the contrary
, if we want to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 the carbon emissions which caused by cars on roads, we should give more importance on railroads.

Train and subway are the most environment-friendly types of transportation; however
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 countries This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :neglect
ignore
 this fact and do not give pay attention on it This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
. Spending more money on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
 can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorate
improve
 the quality of trains and related services; thus
, the populations who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 it increase by the time. Furthermore
, they might prefer to subways if they are in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 condition. To illustrate, I pick the train while I am travelling This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the new trains in my city are more comfortable and have more space for me rather
 than buses. Nevertheless
, if governor did not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
 them, they would still
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
 and their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railway
 network did not enlarge to involve my route.

In conclusion
, my point of view, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 should pay more attention on this Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).issue, and
issue and
 they Please check whether a verb is missing here.
should what
 they This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 do. It is Consider using a past participle here: "included".included
include
 that paying more money on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtracklinerail line
railways
. 