Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Is Nuclear Power a boon or a bane? Do you agree or disagree?

Is Nuclear Power a boon or a bane? jR8PX

The use of radioactive elements to power homes has been a hot topic of debate for decades. Some believe that nuclear energy does more harm than good while others believe in its contrast. I completely agree with the latter as it reduces our dependency on limited energy sources and is more feasible for even developing countries. To begin with, we all know that limited natural resources like coal and petroleum have been in use since the industrial revolution. At the current rate of its usage our next generation might only be able to see these in museums. These sources also cause a lot of pollution and are less efficient as compared to nuclear energy. For example, the USA currently owns nuclear powered ships and submarines which can function for fifty straight years as compared to coal powered ships which consumes two tons of coal every day. Thus, nuclear energy is more efficient and mitigates consumption of limited energy sources. In addition, although setting up nuclear plants might be expensive, in the long run it turns out to be more economical. For example, India, which is still a developing country has invested heavily in Nuclear deals as nuclear power has proven the long term gain. India has also invested in energy sources like solar, wind and hydroelectric but the power throughput cannot meet the demand. Therefore, establishing Nuclear plants is even more feasible for developing countries than setting up alternate source plants at a massive scale. In conclusion, thermonuclear energy is a boon for the planet as it helps us preserve other depleting resources and also are more economical in the long run.

The This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of radioactive elements to power homes has been a hot topic of debate for decades. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 believe that nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 does more harm than This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 while others believe in its contrast. I completely This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with the latter as it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviates
reduces
 our dependency on limited You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 and is more feasible for even This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :Third World countrieslow-income countries
developing countries
.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, we all know that limited natural resources like coal and petroleum have been in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 since the industrial revolution. At the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :contemporarymodern
current
 rate of its usage our next
 generation might This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 be able to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 these in museums. These You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
also
 cause This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
 pollution and are less efficient as compared to nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
. For example
, the USA currently
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possesses
owns
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.nuclear-powered
nuclear powered
 ships and submarines which can function for fifty straight years as compared to coal powered ships which consumes two tons of coal every day. Thus
, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is more efficient and mitigates consumption of limited You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 sources.

In addition
, although setting up nuclear plants might be expensive, in the long run it turns out to be more economical. For example
, India, which is still
 a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :Third World countrylow-income country
developing country
 has invested heavily
 in Nuclear deals as nuclear power has proven the long term gain. India has also
 invested in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 like solar, wind and hydroelectric This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the power throughput cannot This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :attain
meet
 the demand. Therefore
, establishing Nuclear plants is even more feasible for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :Third World countrieslow-income countries
developing countries
 than setting up alternate You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 plants at a massive scale.

In conclusion
, thermonuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is a boon for the planet as it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
 us preserve other depleting resources and also
 are more economical in the long run. 