Both the reading and writing discuss the idea of four day work week for an employee. The author argues that a four-day workweek is beneficial for an individual stating three reasons. However, the speaker contradicts the author and challenges all the reasons stated.
Firstly, the writer explains that a short workweek would increase the company's profits as the employees are more rested and hence make few errors in their work. On the contrary, the lecture negates this argument. He argues that the company would not be benefited from a four-day workweek. He adds that since the company has to spend more money on adding more employees it would cost them more as they need to provide training and health benefits. In addition, the company also has to increase the office space and buy more computers if they hire more which would result in a decrease of their profit.
Secondly, the passage talks about how the four-day workweek can help with unemployment in the country. In contrast, the lecture rebuts this statement. It put it down by explaining that since hiring is costly the company would try not to hire more people. Instead, the company would make the current employees work overtime and raise the expectations that one has to work more i. e it would expect a four-day workweek employee to do five-day work in just 4 days. As a result, this would make the employee's life unpleasant.
Finally, the author also expresses his idea that a four-day workweek would give an employee more free time for himself and it would increase his quality of life and can pursue his private interests. The lecturer in the listening passage is doubtful about this. He contends that having more free time adds some risks and reduces the quality of free time. To add to the above, the employee would also have less job stability and lose his job during economic downtime. He continues that a five-day workweek employee would be given a preference for promotion as he is available the whole week to ensure and monitor the work.
As you can see, the author and professor hold different views on the four-day workweek policy.
Both the reading and writing discuss the
idea
of
four day
work
week
for an
employee
. The
author
argues that a four-day workweek is beneficial for an individual stating three reasons.
However
, the speaker contradicts the
author
and challenges all the reasons stated.
Firstly
, the writer
explains
that a short workweek would increase the
company
's profits as the
employees
are more rested and
hence
make
few errors in their
work
.
On the contrary
, the lecture negates this argument. He argues that the
company
would not
be benefited
from a four-day workweek. He
adds
that since the
company
has to
spend more money on adding more
employees
it would cost them more
as
they need to provide training and health benefits.
In addition
, the
company
also
has to
increase the office space and
buy
more computers if they hire more which would result in a decrease of their profit.
Secondly
, the passage talks about how the four-day workweek can
help
with unemployment in the country.
In contrast
, the lecture rebuts this statement. It put it down by explaining that since hiring is costly the
company
would try not to hire more
people
.
Instead
, the
company
would
make
the
current
employees
work
overtime and raise the expectations that one
has to
work
more i. e it would
expect
a four-day workweek
employee
to do five-day
work
in
just
4 days.
As a result
, this would
make
the employee's life unpleasant.
Finally
, the
author
also
expresses his
idea
that a four-day workweek would give an
employee
more free time for himself and it would increase his quality of life and can pursue his private interests. The lecturer in the listening passage is doubtful about this. He contends that having more free time
adds
some
risks
and
reduces
the quality of free time. To
add
to the above, the
employee
would
also
have less job stability and lose his job during economic downtime. He continues that a five-day workweek
employee
would be
given
a preference for promotion as he is available the whole week to ensure and monitor the work.
As you can
see
, the
author
and professor hold
different
views on the four-day workweek policy.