In tertiary education, female students choose humanities while male learners choose science and other difficult subjects. They choose subjects according to their gender because of social pressure, it should be changed because this will help the society in getting skilled professionals.
Firstly, society pressurizes children and teaches them girls are for household chores and boys are the real bread earners. Because males have to earn their livelihood so they should choose technical subjects. This will help them to get the highest paid jobs; nonetheless, girls have to take care of home and children; hence, they should choose arts. In arts, subjects that are taught are easy and related to home life. When the young minds are continuously taught that their subjects should be according to their gender, they start following the advice of their elders and choose subjects accordingly. For instance, most girls take home science in their secondary class, although they do not have interest in cooking.
Secondly, this should be changed because this will help to get more professionals who excel in their fields. If students choose subjects in social pressure, they do not get success. Subjects should be choosed according to their interest. Some girls have intellectual skills, if they choose science, they will become great scientists and serve the world with their inventions. Such great minds should not be gender-biased. For instance, Kiran Devi is a well-respected civil servant, nevertheless, Sanjeev Kapoor being a male is a famous chef because they choose their professions according to their interests not what suits their gender.
In conclusion, social pressure is a major cause behind girls choosing arts and boys studying science. I personally believe this should be changed because the world will get more successful professionals if they choose subjects according to their interests.
In tertiary education, female students
choose
humanities while male learners
choose
science
and other difficult
subjects
. They
choose
subjects
according
to their gender
because
of social pressure, it should be
changed
because
this will
help
the society in getting skilled professionals.
Firstly
, society pressurizes children and teaches them
girls
are for household chores and boys are the real bread earners.
Because
males
have to
earn their livelihood
so
they should
choose
technical
subjects
. This will
help
them to
get
the highest paid jobs; nonetheless,
girls
have to
take care of home and children;
hence
, they should
choose
arts. In arts,
subjects
that
are taught
are easy and related to home life. When the young minds are
continuously
taught that their
subjects
should be
according
to their gender, they
start
following the advice of their elders and
choose
subjects
accordingly
.
For instance
, most
girls
take home
science
in their secondary
class
, although they do not have
interest
in cooking.
Secondly
, this should be
changed
because
this will
help
to
get
more professionals who excel in their fields. If students
choose
subjects
in social pressure, they do not
get
success.
Subjects
should be
choosed
according
to their
interest
.
Some
girls
have intellectual
skills
, if they
choose
science
, they will become great scientists and serve the world with their inventions. Such great minds should not be gender-biased.
For instance
, Kiran Devi is a well-respected civil servant,
nevertheless
, Sanjeev
Kapoor
being a male is a
famous
chef
because
they
choose
their professions
according
to their
interests
not what suits their gender.
In conclusion
, social pressure is a major cause behind
girls
choosing arts and boys studying
science
. I
personally
believe this should be
changed
because
the world will
get
more successful professionals if they
choose
subjects
according
to their
interests
.