Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Is animal testing justified

Is animal testing justified 2qRk

The mistreatment of animals for the sake of science has been a cause for debate since ancient times. While some people agree that this is essential for the progress of science, others think that experimentation on these speechless creatures should be made illegal. In this essay, I will explore whether this experimentation is acceptable and if there are any alternatives that can be introduced. Experimentation on animals can be classified into two types, one which is related to the testing of live-saving medicines or vaccines and the other which is used for checking the side effects of luxury products. In the first case, the future of the human species may be at stake and unfortunately the experimentation on animals does get justified. When faced with a pandemic, with people dying in the thousands, would we not be more concerned about our fellow beings. On the other hand, animals are also being used to test products such as makeup and perfumes, which are not a necessity and thus do not have a justification. In conclusion, we can continue to justify this inhumane behavior, but it is prudent to start looking for alternatives. Scientists should focus on using animals only for those experiments that are of a commercial nature. In addition, one of the fields that scientists may focus on could be cloning. In this case, test subjects may be created solely with the purpose of experimentation. While this still raises many ethical and legislative questions, it could be a viable alternative. To conclude I would say that animal testing has become a necessary evil in our times and we all need to work towards looking for alternatives to this substantially heartbreaking practice

The mistreatment of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 for the sake of science has been a cause for debate since ancient times. While This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that this is essential for the progress of science, others This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrial and errorexperimenttesting
experimentation
 on these speechless creatures should be made
 illegal. In this essay, I will explore whether this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrial and errorexperimenttesting
experimentation
 is acceptable and if there are any alternatives that can be introduced
.

Experimentation on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 can be classified
 into two types, one which is related
 to the testing of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
-saving medicines or vaccines and the other which is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for checking the side effects of luxury products. In the first
 case, the future of the human species may be at stake and unfortunately the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrial and errorexperimenttesting
experimentation
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 does This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 justified. When faced with a pandemic, with This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 dying in the thousands, would we not be more concerned about our fellow beings. On the other hand
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are also
 being This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluate
test
 products such as makeup and perfumes, which are not a necessity and thus
 do not have a justification.

In conclusion
, we can continue to justify this inhumane behavior, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it is prudent to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 looking for alternatives. Scientists should focus on using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 for those experiments that are of a commercial nature. In addition
, one of the fields that scientists may focus on could be cloning. In this case
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluate
test
 subjects may be created
solely
 with the purpose of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrial and errorexperimenttesting
experimentation
. While this still
 raises This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 ethical and legislative questions, it could be a viable alternative.

To conclude
 I would say that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 testing has become a necessary evil in our Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).times, and
times and
 we all need to work towards looking for alternatives to this substantially
 heartbreaking practice