It is a well-known fact that being interviewed is one of the most influential factors in being usually assigned to a job in renowned organizations. Although several people truly agree with it, some do not. In my opinion, I believe that despite there being other improved options, being intuitively interrogated for new employment still the most efficient way.
On the one hand, there is an effective reason why the interview is highly preferred by some employers while hiring new employees because, with the he of this, the employer receives a first-hand impression of the potential employee and gets to know him, not only through his qualifications or past achievements but on a personal level which is crucial for proper work surrounding. Hence, how the individual presents himself and harmoniously interacts is a direct reflection of his individuality, social skills as well as intelligence. For example, by asking case study type questions they can judge traits like the ability to handle pressure, confidence and skill to think outside the box.
On the other hand, Other alternate methods include a written test, which I do not believe provides sufficient assessment for official recruitment by itself. on the contrary, combining both oral and written exam can be an excellent way of measuring one’s abilities. In addition, Assessment through practical field works is one less practised still an effective option, especially for jobs that require both skill and experience, for example, civil or mechanical engineering. However, this method might be time-consuming and financially draining and thus not commonly utilized.
In conclusion, it seems that when the job interview is used in conjunction with another identity tests, it would appear to be the most worthwhile and practical mean of the recruitment process for industries to find the best job candidates in varying circumstances.
It is a well-known fact that
being interviewed
is one of the most influential factors in being
usually
assigned to a
job
in renowned organizations. Although several
people
truly
agree
with it,
some
do not. In my opinion, I believe that despite there being other
improved
options, being
intuitively
interrogated for new employment
still
the most efficient way.
On the one hand, there is an effective reason why the interview is
highly
preferred by
some
employers while hiring new employees
because
, with
the he
of this, the employer receives a
first
-hand impression of the potential employee and
gets
to know him, not
only
through his qualifications or past achievements
but
on a personal level which is crucial for proper work surrounding.
Hence
, how the individual presents himself and
harmoniously
interacts is a direct reflection of his individuality, social
skills
as well
as intelligence.
For example
, by asking case study type questions they can judge traits like the ability to handle pressure, confidence and
skill
to
think
outside the box.
On the other hand
, Other alternate methods include a written
test
, which I do not believe provides sufficient assessment for official recruitment by itself.
on
the contrary, combining both oral and written exam can be an excellent way of measuring one’s abilities.
In addition
, Assessment through practical field works is one less
practised
still
an effective option,
especially
for
jobs
that require both
skill
and experience,
for example
, civil or mechanical engineering.
However
, this method might be time-consuming and
financially
draining and
thus
not
commonly
utilized.
In conclusion
, it seems that when the
job
interview is
used
in conjunction with another identity
tests
, it would appear to be the most worthwhile and practical mean of the recruitment process for industries to find the best
job
candidates in varying circumstances.