Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. eNap
Companies provide employment to the large number of people. The success of any business depends on the quality of the staff so employers conduct the interview to select new workers. Few individuals think that interview is not only a way to appoint somebody on a job. I disagree with the given statement, which says that interview is not a reliable method but there are other better methods also for hiring employee in a company. To begin with, there are numerous reasons that why interview is being always preferred by the big enterprises; because it is a face-to-face communication where an employer who held the interview and an employee answered the questions regarding to his field. Moreover, a person who is taking the interview can easily judged the personality traits such as skills, confidence, behavior, IQ, self-awareness, self-confidence, attitude and many more. After reviewing the qualities of an interviewee the interviewer put the right person on a right job accordingly to his traits. Big companies like reliance company appointed their workers through taking an interview and accordingly to their studies it is a mention worthy example to cite over here. Hence, this is the main aspect that why interview is being preferred. Admittedly, if face-to-face talk is not a dependable method to recruit a person on a job then there are multifarious methods which can be used to appoint an individual on a job. Firstly, written test method can be applied by the large companies for recruiting the workers in which multiple choice questions would be given to them for testing their knowledge and capability of understanding. Secondly, assessment centres would be preferred in which the team activities would be done as well as competancy based skills would be judged. It is a good paradigm to mention here is in the field of marketing these tests would be mostly applied in which employee traits can be judged. Ergo, that are some tests which are better than the interview. From my book of experience, I think so that the face-to-face conversation is better than the other tests which are applied because in an interview a interviewer can easily judged the personal traits of the person whilst through the other tests which are applied a person can only judged about the knowledge of that person in the particular field. If a company applied both of these tests would be too expensive that a company can not conduct these to hire an employee. In a conclusion, I do not agree with that the interview is not a reliable method while other methods are better. In some situations, conducting interview is more apt and in some situations the other methods may be more advantageous.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Companies
provide employment to the large number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. The success of any business depends on the quality of the staff
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
employers conduct the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
to select new workers. Few individuals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
a way to appoint somebody on a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
. I disagree with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
statement, which says that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not a reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
there are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
also
for hiring employee in a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, there are numerous reasons that why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'is' and 'being'.
is being always
preferred by the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
enterprises;
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is a face-to-face communication where an employer who held the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
and an employee answered the questions
The phrase 'regarding to' is not correct. Use "regarding" or "regard to".
regarding to
his field.
Moreover
, a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
who is taking the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
can
easily
The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: "judge"
judged
the personality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
such as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
, confidence, behavior, IQ, self-awareness, self-confidence, attitude and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
more.
“After” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
After
reviewing the qualities of an interviewee the interviewer put the right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
on a right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
accordingly
to his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
like reliance
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
appointed their workers through taking an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
and
accordingly
to their studies it is a mention worthy example to cite over here.
Hence
, this is the main aspect that why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is
being preferred
.

Admittedly
, if face-to-face talk is not a dependable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
to recruit a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
on a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
then there are multifarious
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
which can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to appoint an individual on a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
.
Firstly
, written
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
can be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applied
by the large
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
for recruiting the workers in which multiple choice questions would be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
to them for testing their knowledge and capability of understanding.
Secondly
, assessment
Possible spelling mistake. 'centres' is British English.
centres
would
be preferred
in which the team activities would
be done
as well
as
Possible spelling mistake found.
competancy
based
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
would be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
judged
. It is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
paradigm to mention here is in the field of marketing these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
would be
mostly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applied
in which employee
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
can be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
judged
. Ergo, that are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
which are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
than the interview.

From my book of experience, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that the face-to-face conversation is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
which are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applied
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
in an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
Use "an" instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
a
interviewer can
easily
The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: "judge"
judged
the personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
whilst through the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
which are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applied
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
judged
about the knowledge of that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
in the particular field. If a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
applied
both of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tests
would be too expensive that a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
can not conduct these to hire an employee.

In a conclusion, I do not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not a reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
. In
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
situations, conducting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is more apt and in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
situations the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
may be more advantageous.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
449 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts