In contemporary society, it is somehow believed that international visitors should pay a higher price than the locals when they visit cultural and historical sites. Personally, I strongly disagree with this statement.
For a variety of reasons, it would be ineffective for the development of the local tourism if foreign tourists are asked to pay higher prices. First and foremost, such suggestions may come from the fact that these sites need a stable source of revenue to maintain their operations. While local people help keep these attractions intact, they believe it is the responsibility of people from other countries to give a little more financial aid as a win-win situation. However, people with this way of thinking may not be aware of the benefits that foreign visitors have already brought along as they visit the sites. Thanks to these international tourists, there are more trading activities because visitors need to be kept fed and watered. Obviously, they create more jobs and encourage cash flow within the local market.
Apart from the above mentioned practical concern, it would be unjustifiable if foreign tourists have to pay more than local people. Such unfair prices may drive the tourists away when they figure out the truth because it hints a sense of inequality. Instead of feeling they are making contributions, these dissatisfied customers may have a feeling of being exploited. As a result, this will have negative impacts on the local touristry. This is not mentioning a threat that these bad reputations can become widespread through negative reviews and words of mouth in the international travel community, which may bring down the whole economy of a nation.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that it is unfair for travellers from other countries to pay more than the local tourists. Although they are not frequent dwellers, their integral roles in the growth of the local travel industry are essential.
In contemporary society, it is somehow believed that international visitors should
pay
a higher price than the
locals
when they visit cultural and historical sites.
Personally
, I
strongly
disagree with this statement.
For a variety of reasons, it would be ineffective for the development of the
local
tourism if foreign
tourists
are asked
to
pay
higher prices.
First
and foremost, such suggestions may
come
from the fact that these sites need a stable source of revenue to maintain their operations. While
local
people
help
keep
these attractions intact, they believe it is the responsibility of
people
from other countries to give a
little
more financial aid as a win-win situation.
However
,
people
with this way of thinking may not be aware of the benefits that foreign visitors have already brought along as they visit the sites. Thanks to these international
tourists
, there are more trading activities
because
visitors need to be
kept
fed and watered.
Obviously
, they create more jobs and encourage cash flow within the
local
market.
Apart from the above mentioned practical concern, it would be unjustifiable if foreign
tourists
have to
pay
more than
local
people
. Such unfair prices may drive the
tourists
away when they figure out the truth
because
it hints a sense of inequality.
Instead
of feeling they are making contributions, these dissatisfied customers may have a feeling of
being exploited
.
As a result
, this will have
negative
impacts on the
local
touristry
. This is not mentioning a threat that these
bad
reputations can become widespread through
negative
reviews and words of mouth in the international travel community, which may bring down the whole economy of a nation.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that it is unfair for
travellers
from other countries to
pay
more than the
local
tourists
. Although they are not frequent dwellers, their integral roles in the growth of the
local
travel industry are essential.