Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Integrated writing (Source: ETS guide 4th edition practice test 2)

Integrated writing (Source: ETS guide 4th edition practice test 2) jRQPa
The reading states that the professors appearing on TV is of great benefit to himself, the university and the public. It provides three reasons of support. They are gaining reputation for the professor, for the college and to educate the general public. However, the lecture refutes to author's opinion. First, the reading claims that the professors who appear on TV gains reputation as authorities in their academic fields. However, the lecture refutes the point by saying that the professors who appear on TV frequently are not generally viewed as a serious scholar. As a result they will receive less invitation to attend academic conferences or less likely to receive research grant. This seriously lessen the professors opportunity to further grow as a researcher. Second, the reading posits that the university will benefit a lot with such appearance in TV. However, the lecture opposes the point by saying that it will have negative effect on students and the university. In addition it takes a lot of time to prepare including preparation for the material, travelling and even dressing up to look good in front of camera. This precious time can also be used to teach class, help students, or even do further research. Third, the reading states that public will be benefited if professor appears on TV. In contrast, the lecture states that it does not help in educating the general public. The lecture explains that, the TV network is not interested in having the professor explaining the intellectual substances of their researches. Rather, they are interested in having them explain some basic background information or history. This type of information can be easily presented by a serious reporter who has done his work properly. Because of the above three reasons, it is highly questionable whether professors appearing on TV has any advantage. In fact it bring negative consequences to himself and also the universities they teach.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
states that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professors
appearing on TV is of great benefit to himself, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
university
and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
. It provides three reasons of support. They are gaining reputation for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
, for the college and to educate the general
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
refutes to author's opinion.

First
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
claims that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professors
who appear on TV gains reputation as authorities in their academic fields.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
refutes the point by saying that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professors
who appear on TV
frequently
are not
generally
viewed as a serious scholar.
As a result
they will receive less invitation to attend academic conferences or less likely to receive research grant. This
seriously
lessen the
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "professors'" or "professor's"?
professors
opportunity to
further
grow as a researcher.

Second, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
posits that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
university
will benefit a lot with such appearance in TV.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
opposes the point by saying that it will have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
effect on students and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
university
. In
The comma is probably missing here: "addition, it".
addition it
takes
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
time to prepare including preparation for the material, travelling and even dressing up to look
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
in front of camera. This precious time can
also
be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to teach
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
students, or even do
further
research.

Third, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
states that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
will
be benefited
if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
appears on TV.
In contrast
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
states that it does not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
in educating the general
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that, the TV network is not interested in having the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
explaining the intellectual substances of their researches.
Rather
, they
are interested
in having them
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
basic background information or history. This type of information can be
easily
presented by a serious reporter who has done his work
properly
.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Because
of the above three reasons, it is
highly
questionable whether
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professors
appearing on TV has any advantage. In
The comma is probably missing here: "fact, it".
fact it
Did you mean "brings"?
bring
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
consequences to himself and
also
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universities
they teach.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Integrated writing (Source: ETS guide 4th edition practice test 2)

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
316 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Integrated writing (Source: ETS guide 4th edition practice test 2)