The reading passage says that when project is accomplished by a group of people it would have several advantages and yield better results than working individually. However, the lecturer casts doubt on those advantages.
First, the reading states that the individual members of the group could actually shine in the team because their contributions and ideas are greatly recognized and this would lead to overall good results in the team by working together than working individually. In contrast, the lecturer states that some members in the team do not contribute any ideas and if the project resulted in success the credit goes to whole team but not for the members who have struggled hard to make it success.
Next, the reading says that if the project is assigned to a group there would be more quick responses and creative solutions and project is completed more quickly than those accomplished by separate individuals. However, the lecturer casts doubt on it and says that some projects would take more time when accomplished in a group because they should arrange meetings between their members to come to an agreement and take final decision about the project.
Finally, the author says that the team members who have voice in taking decision would feel better and rewarding about carrying the work that is entailed by their decision than doing work imposed by others. In contrast, the lecturer says that in a group one or two people would become influential and it affects the team. The other team members were neglected and the influential people would pass their ideas instead of being discussed with the other team members, only because such influential people would not be interested in them. Moreover, when a project would fail due to the effects of such people the whole group members would be blamed.
In sum, the reading states that in projects group work would yield better results than working alone. However, the lecturer casts doubt on these advantages and disagree with the author's opinion.
The
reading
passage
says
that when
project
is accomplished
by a
group
of
people
it would have several advantages and yield better results than
working
individually
.
However
, the
lecturer
casts doubt on those advantages.
First
, the
reading
states that the individual
members
of the
group
could actually shine in the
team
because
their contributions and
ideas
are
greatly
recognized and this would lead to
overall
good
results in the
team
by
working
together
than
working
individually
.
In contrast
, the
lecturer
states that
some
members
in the
team
do not contribute any
ideas
and if the
project
resulted in success the credit goes to whole
team
but
not for the
members
who have struggled
hard
to
make
it success.
Next
, the
reading
says
that if the
project
is assigned
to a
group
there would be more quick responses and creative solutions and
project
is completed
more
quickly
than those accomplished by separate individuals.
However
, the
lecturer
casts doubt on it and
says
that
some
projects
would take more time when accomplished in a
group
because
they should arrange meetings between their
members
to
come
to an agreement and take final decision about the project.
Finally
, the author
says
that the
team
members
who have voice in taking decision would feel better and rewarding about carrying the work that
is entailed
by their decision than doing work imposed by others.
In contrast
, the
lecturer
says
that in a
group
one or two
people
would become influential and it affects the
team
. The other
team
members
were neglected
and the influential
people
would pass their
ideas
instead
of
being discussed
with the other
team
members
,
only
because
such influential
people
would not
be interested
in them.
Moreover
, when a
project
would fail due to the effects of such
people
the whole
group
members
would
be blamed
.
In sum, the
reading
states that in
projects
group
work would yield better results than
working
alone.
However
, the
lecturer
casts doubt on these advantages and disagree with the author's opinion.