The passage and the lecture talks about how private collectors are buying fossils and how this has turned into a booming business. The debate that follows throws light on the impact of this trade on general public and scientists.
Firstly, the passage suggests that the fossils that would normally end up in museums are now being bought by private collectors. These collectors usually don't let the general public view these fossils which can ultimately lead to a " decline in public interest" towards these artifacts. The lecturer however contradicts this opinion and points out how the private collectors end up selling these fossils to institutions like schools, where they are put up for display. This provides an even wider access to the common public for viewing and appreciating these fossils.
Secondly, the lecturer dismisses the opinion depicted in the passage that scientists loose the opportunity to make important discoveries related to extinct life forms when private collectors buy the fossils. She explains how, to determine the actual value of any fossil, it needs to be evaluated by an expert. These experts are none other than the scientists. Therefore, irrespective of the location where the fossil would end up - a museum or a private collection- it has to pass through the hands of a scientist.
Finally, the lecturer goes on to mention the fact that Universities or similar research organizations rarely carry out any excavation operations. Consequently, if it wasn't for the commercial collectors, who invest time and money on such operations, most of the fossils would've remained undiscovered. As a result, the lecturer feels its better to have more number of fossils being discovered, even though the commercial collectors may miss out on crucial evidence while retrieving these artifacts, as mentioned in the passage.
The
passage
and the lecture talks about how
private
collectors are buying
fossils
and how this has turned into a booming business. The debate that follows throws light on the impact of this trade on general
public
and scientists.
Firstly
, the
passage
suggests that the
fossils
that would
normally
end
up in museums are
now
being
bought
by
private
collectors. These collectors
usually
don't
let
the general
public
view these
fossils
which can
ultimately
lead to a
"
; decline in
public
interest"
; towards these artifacts. The
lecturer
however
contradicts this opinion and points out how the
private
collectors
end
up selling these
fossils
to institutions like schools, where they
are put
up for display. This provides an even wider access to the common
public
for viewing and appreciating these fossils.
Secondly
, the
lecturer
dismisses the opinion depicted in the
passage
that scientists loose the opportunity to
make
important
discoveries related to extinct life forms when
private
collectors
buy
the
fossils
. She
explains
how, to determine the actual value of any
fossil
, it needs to
be evaluated
by an expert. These experts are none other than the scientists.
Therefore
, irrespective of the location where the
fossil
would
end
up
-
a museum or a
private
collection- it
has to
pass through the hands of a scientist.
Finally
, the
lecturer
goes on to mention the fact that Universities or similar research organizations rarely carry out any excavation operations.
Consequently
, if it wasn't for the commercial collectors, who invest time and money on such operations, most of the
fossils
would've remained undiscovered.
As a result
, the
lecturer
feels its better to have more number of
fossils
being discovered
,
even though
the commercial collectors may miss out on crucial evidence while retrieving these artifacts, as mentioned in the
passage
.