The lecture and the passage both talk about endotherms and several points have been made as to if or not the dinosaurs were endotherms. The author of the reading passage reasons about the dinosaurs being endotherms. However, the professor contends that the presented evidence in the passage is not proof that dinosaurs were endotherms. The professor casts doubt on the claims made in the passage with several points.
To begin with, the professor disputes the claim about dinosaurs in polar region by stating that the temprature in that part of the earth were much warmer in the pre historic periods. Nonetheless, during the winters, the dinosaurs may have migrated to a warmer location or hibernated like various other animals.
Secondly, the passage claims that dinosaurs were endotherms based on their leg positined below the body rather than on the side like other reptiles. The professor disagrees to the leg position theory by stating that these body structres were merely the result of huge size and were helpful in supporting the massive weight of these creatures. Being large clearly had its own advantage in survival so this explains the leg position.
Finally, the passage states that the presence of Harvesian canals like other explains why the dinosaurs were one of them. In contrast, the lecturer brings another evidence into light about the presence of growth rings. These growth rings indicate periodic growth in dinosaurs i. e they stopped growing in the winters and grew only during other season unlike the endotherms whose growth isn't affected by seasons.
in conclusion, the points made by the lecturer contradicts or disproves the claims made by the author of the paragraph. Thus the debate about dinosaurs being endotherms or not is disputable.
The lecture and the
passage
both talk about endotherms and several points have
been made
as to
if or not
the dinosaurs were endotherms. The author of the reading
passage
reasons about the dinosaurs being endotherms.
However
, the
professor
contends that the presented evidence in the
passage
is not proof that dinosaurs were endotherms. The
professor
casts doubt on the
claims
made in the
passage
with several points.
To
begin
with, the
professor
disputes the
claim
about dinosaurs in polar region by stating that the
temprature
in that part of the earth were much warmer in the
pre
historic periods. Nonetheless, during the winters, the dinosaurs may have migrated to a warmer location or hibernated like various
other
animals.
Secondly
, the
passage
claims
that dinosaurs were endotherms based on their leg
positined
below the body
rather
than on the side like
other
reptiles. The
professor
disagrees to the leg position theory by stating that these body
structres
were
merely
the result of huge size and were helpful in supporting the massive weight of these creatures. Being large
clearly
had its
own
advantage in survival
so
this
explains
the leg position.
Finally
, the
passage
states that the presence of
Harvesian
canals like
other
explains
why the dinosaurs were one of them.
In contrast
, the lecturer brings another evidence into light about the presence of
growth
rings. These
growth
rings indicate periodic
growth
in dinosaurs i. e they
stopped
growing in the winters and grew
only
during
other
season unlike the endotherms whose
growth
isn't
affected
by seasons.
in
conclusion, the points made by the lecturer contradicts or disproves the
claims
made by the author of the paragraph.
Thus
the debate about dinosaurs being endotherms or not is disputable.