Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

United Kingdom's archaelogy

United Kingdom's archaelogy KwY9N

The reading and lecture are both about United Kingdom's archaelogy if there was a problems with studying artifacts in Britain or not. The author of the reading believes that study of cultural artifacts in UK faced many severe problems. The lecturer casts doubt all the arguments made in the article. He is of the opinion that there was a new guidline to foster archaelogical studies in UK. First of all, the author suggests that in 1950 the building new conctraction developed in Britain and it led to damage archeological values in Britain. The argument is challenged by the professor. He is of the opinion that with a new guideline archeologists checked the construction site before building it and they proserved archeological values. Second, the writer contends that the potential granter of archelogical studies in Britain was the government. Therefore, it leads archeologists to investigate the most important sites. The lecturer, however rebuts this by mentioning that the construction company paid archeologists. Furthermore, he explains that according to the new guideline the construction companies were responsible to pay archeologists. Finally, it is stated in the article that it was difficult ot pursue an archeology career in Britain. The writer establishes that there were a very few posion available. The lecturer, on the other hand posits that archeology job was increased in that time rather than before. He put forth the idea that archeology job was paid job and many article were written that boost archeology in the country.

The reading and lecture are both about United Kingdom's Possible spelling mistake found.archaeology
archaelogy
 if Did you mean "there were a problems"?there were a problems
there was a problems
 with studying artifacts in Britain or not. The author of the reading believes that study of cultural artifacts in UK faced This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 severe problems. Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
 lecturer casts doubt all the arguments made in the article. He is of the opinion that there was a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
Possible spelling mistake found.guideline
guidline
 to foster Possible spelling mistake found.archaeological
archaelogical
 studies in UK.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, the author suggests that in 1950 the building You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
Possible spelling mistake found.contraction
conctraction
 developed in Britain and it led to damage archeological values in Britain. The argument is challenged
 by the professor. He is of the opinion that with a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 guideline archeologists This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitored
checked
 the construction site This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 building Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).it, and
it and
 they Possible spelling mistake found.preservedpro served
proserved
 archeological values.

Second, the writer contends that the potential granter of Possible spelling mistake found.archeological
archelogical
 studies in Britain was the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
. Therefore
, it leads archeologists to investigate the most This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 sites. The lecturer, however
 rebuts this by mentioning that the construction This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
 paid archeologists. Furthermore
, he This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interprets
explains
 that according to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
 guideline the construction This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisescorporations
companies
 were responsible to pay archeologists.

Finally
, it is stated
 in the article that it was difficult Possible spelling mistake found.OToftoatonit
ot
 pursue an archeology career in Britain. The writer establishes that there were a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 few Possible spelling mistake found.poisonpotion
posion
 available. The lecturer, on the other hand
 posits that archeology job was increased
 in that time rather
 than This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
. He put forth the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 that archeology job was paid
 job and Possible agreement error. The noun article seems to be countable; consider using: "many articles".many articles
many article
were written
 that boost archeology in the country. 