The passage states about the problem, advantages of advertisement and security in a franchise supporting it to be the safest business, which the lecture completely refutes. In addition to that, the professor is giving an extra information about the safe business.
Firstly, the passage says franchise to be less risky than having own business and it is not costly as well, as it has already reliable suppliers, equipment, raw materials. However, the professor disagrees because studies show that franchise is not the best business, because many parent company force them to buy some specific products which are overpriced than the equivalent materials which are cheaper in market.
Secondly, advertisement by the parent company can not be considered to be beneficial for the franchise owner as they do it for their business not particularly for the franchise owners. Still they have to pay the 6% of the total sum of benefit for the advertisement. Hence, its not true as mentioned in the passage.
Third point is about security in own business and franchise. Which is low for franchise according to the passage. But, the lecture refutes the point stating that, it is not the most safe business. In addition, the professor says about buying already existing business, which the passage is missing out. which has the chance of succeeding twice than the benefit of its previous owner.
Thus the lecture casts doubt about all the three points made in the passage about franchise and own business. It proves buying already existing business to be the best one, which has lesser risk and more security than franchise and own business.
The
passage
states about the problem, advantages of advertisement and security in a franchise supporting it to be the safest
business
, which the lecture completely refutes.
In addition
to that, the professor is giving
an extra information
about the safe business.
Firstly
, the
passage
says franchise to be less risky than having
own
business
and it is not costly
as well
, as it has already reliable suppliers, equipment, raw materials.
However
, the professor disagrees
because
studies
show
that franchise is not the best
business
,
because
many
parent
company
force them to
buy
some
specific products which
are overpriced
than the equivalent materials which are cheaper in market.
Secondly
, advertisement by the parent
company
can not
be considered
to be beneficial for the franchise owner as they do it for their
business
not
particularly
for the franchise owners.
Still
they
have to
pay the 6% of the total sum of benefit for the advertisement.
Hence
, its not true as mentioned in the passage.
Third point is about security in
own
business
and franchise. Which is low for franchise according to the
passage
.
But
, the lecture refutes the point stating that, it is not
the most safe
business
.
In addition
, the professor says about buying already existing
business
, which the
passage
is missing out.
which
has the chance of succeeding
twice
than the benefit of its previous owner.
Thus
the lecture casts doubt about all the three points made in the
passage
about franchise and
own
business
. It proves buying already existing
business
to be the best one, which has lesser
risk
and more security than franchise and
own
business
.